What is a Curative Petition? is a key topic under Polity And Governance for UPSC Civil Services Examination. Key points include: A curative petition is the last legal recourse after a review petition is dismissed.. It was established by the Supreme Court in the Rupa Ashok Hurra case (2002).. Its objective is to prevent grave miscarriage of justice and deter abuse of legal process.. Understanding this topic is essential for both UPSC Prelims and Mains preparation.
What is a Curative Petition? is a Medium-level topic in UPSC Polity And Governance. It is tested in both Prelims (factual MCQs) and Mains (analytical answer writing). Previous year UPSC questions have frequently covered aspects of What is a Curative Petition?, making it essential for comprehensive IAS preparation.
To prepare What is a Curative Petition? for UPSC: (1) Study the comprehensive notes covering all key concepts on Vaidra. (2) Practice previous year questions on this topic. (3) Connect it with current affairs using daily updates. (4) Revise using key takeaways and mind maps available for Polity And Governance. (5) Write practice answers linking What is a Curative Petition? to related GS Paper topics.

A curative petition is a crucial legal remedy available in the Indian judicial system. It serves as the last possible legal recourse after a review petition against a final conviction has already been dismissed.
Definition: A curative petition is a legal recourse available after the dismissal of a review plea against a final conviction.
Constitutionally, a final ruling by the Supreme Court is typically challenged through a review petition. However, such review petitions are generally limited to very narrow procedural grounds.
The curative petition is a sparingly used judicial innovation. Its primary purpose is to rectify a grave miscarriage of justice that might have occurred even after the review process.
The core objective behind the introduction of the curative petition is two-fold:
The process for deciding curative petitions is distinct from regular appeals or review petitions.
Typical Decision: Curative petitions are usually decided by judges in their chambers, meaning without an open court hearing.
However, an open-court hearing may be granted in exceptional circumstances, specifically upon a specific request from the petitioner and if the court deems it necessary.
The principles and guidelines governing the filing and consideration of curative petitions were not originally enshrined in the Constitution. They were established through a landmark judicial pronouncement.
Landmark Case: The legal framework for curative petitions was laid down by the Supreme Court in the significant case of Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra & another Case in 2002.
The Supreme Court has laid down strict criteria for a curative petition to be entertained, ensuring its use is limited to genuine cases of injustice.
The filing process for a curative petition also involves specific procedural requirements:


MeitY Seeks Delay on WhatsApp Username Feature Over Fraud Risks — Implications for Intermediary Regulation
10 Jul 2026
MeitY Seeks Delay on WhatsApp Username Feature Over Fraud Risks — Implications for Intermediary Regulation
10 Jul 2026
भारत के IT मंत्रालय ने WhatsApp के username फीचर उत्तर के लिए समय सीमा बढ़ा दी – साइबर सुरक्षा चिंताएँ उजागर
9 Jul 2026
India's IT Ministry Extends Deadline for WhatsApp's Username Feature Reply – Cybersecurity Concerns Highlighted
9 Jul 2026