Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र को हर 10‑15 मामलों के लिए 1 एक्सक्लूसिव NIA कोर्ट बनाने का निर्देश दिया, तथा कम से कम 1 ट्रायल प्रति माह पूरा करने का आग्रह किया

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र को एक्सक्लूसिव NIA कोर्ट स्थापित करने का निर्देश दिया—हर 10‑15 लंबित मामलों के लिए एक, 15 से अधिक के लिए दो, और 25 से अधिक के लिए तीन—ताकि UAPA जैसे विशेष अधिनियमों के तहत मामलों के लिए कम से कम एक ट्रायल प्रति माह सुनिश्चित किया जा सके, जिससे आतंकवाद‑संबंधी ट्रायलों का समय‑बद्ध निपटारा हो सके।
To enable timebound disposal of trials in cases under special statutes like the UAPA, the Supreme Court yesterday directed setting up of exclusive Courts under Section 11 of the NIA Act. It stipulated that atleast 1 such court be setup for upto 10 pending trials under a High Court, 2 for over 15 pending trials, and 3 courts for over 25 pending trials. A bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was dealing with the suo motu case concerning the creation of exclusive courts to tackle cases under special statutes like UAPA, NDPS, etc. During the hearing, responding to the Court's earlier query as to whether Union's funding to set up exclusive Courts will extend to the Special Courts set up by the States under Section 22 of the Act (which handle cases prosecuted by State agencies), Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati said that at this stage, such extension would dilute the financial grant. She further informed that, of the 17 states to which the Court had initially issued notice, 5 now have dedicated courts. With regard to Delhi, it was conveyed that the exclusive NIA Court would become functional within this week. In this backdrop, the Court directed the Union (NIA) to approach the Chief Justices of the High Courts and consult them for the purpose of setting up exclusive NIA Courts under Section 11 of the Act. The Chief Justices, in turn, were requested to consult the State governments and provide requisite exclusive sufficient space for establishment of the Courts, "where the Presiding Officer shall be entrusted only the trials under Section 11 of the Act". The Court made it clear that no other case shall be entrusted to these exclusive courts and all trials pending under Section 11 before such courts shall be taken up on day-to-day basis. The Presiding Officer shall be at liberty to list the cases in the manner they want, while "ensuring that atleast 1 trial is concluded within 1 month". The number of exclusive courts to be set up under Section 11 of the Act were delineated by the Court thus - - Atleast 1 exclusive court for 10 pending trials; - 2 Courts if there are over more than 15 pending trials; - 3 Courts for more than 25 pending trials. That is, the broad criteria shall be 1 exclusive court for 10-15 pending trials. As per the directions, the Courts shall be setup within 1 month. The Court also directed the States to comply with its earlier directions regarding provision of additional building, etc. for setting up the Courts. Following the same, the Union shall release the necessary funds in terms of its policy decision, it said. In response to ASG Bhati's submission on Union funding of Courts handling State-prosecuted cases, CJI Kant orally expressed that the exclusive courts set up under Section 11 of the Act may begin with NIA-prosecuted trials, and once they are over, they can take up State-prosecuted trials. Before passing any directions
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र को हर 10‑15 मामलों के लिए 1 एक्सक्लूसिव NIA कोर्ट बनाने का निर्देश दिया, तथा कम से कम 1 ट्रायल प्रति माह पूरा करने का आग्रह किया
Must Review
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs285% UPSC Relevance

Supreme Court mandates exclusive NIA courts to fast‑track terrorism trials across India

Key Facts

  1. Supreme Court, on 8 May 2026, directed the Centre to set up exclusive NIA courts under Section 11 of the NIA Act.
  2. One exclusive court is to be created for every 10‑15 pending NIA trials; two courts for >15 trials; three courts for >25 trials.
  3. Each exclusive court must conclude at least one trial every month.
  4. CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard the suo motu case on exclusive courts for UAPA, NDPS and other special statutes.
  5. Five states have already established dedicated exclusive NIA courts; Delhi’s court to become functional within the week of 9 May 2026.
  6. The Union (NIA) must consult High Court Chief Justices and State governments for space and funding; State‑prosecuted cases may be taken up after NIA cases are cleared.

Background & Context

The directive addresses the chronic backlog of terrorism‑related cases under statutes like the UAPA and NDPS, reflecting the judiciary's push for time‑bound disposal and inter‑governmental coordination. It ties into UPSC themes of judicial reforms, federal responsibilities, and internal security management.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Functions and responsibilities of Union and StatesGS2•Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functionsGS3•Role of external state and non-state actors in security challengesGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioningEssay•Philosophy, Ethics and Human ValuesPrelims_CSAT•Decision Making

Mains Answer Angle

GS2 (Polity & Governance) – Discuss the Supreme Court's role in judicial reforms for special courts and assess its impact on federal‑centre cooperation and internal security.

Full Article

<p>To enable timebound disposal of trials in cases under special statutes like the UAPA, the Supreme Court yesterday directed setting up of exclusive Courts under Section 11 of the NIA Act. It stipulated that atleast 1 such court be setup for upto 10 pending trials under a High Court, 2 for over 15 pending trials, and 3 courts for over 25 pending trials.</p><p>A bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was dealing with the suo motu case concerning the creation of exclusive courts to tackle cases under special statutes like UAPA, NDPS, etc.</p><p>During the hearing, responding to the Court's earlier query as to whether Union's funding to set up exclusive Courts will extend to the Special Courts set up by the States under Section 22 of the Act (which handle cases prosecuted by State agencies), Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati said that at this stage, such extension would dilute the financial grant.</p><p>She further informed that, of the 17 states to which the Court had initially issued notice, 5 now have dedicated courts. With regard to Delhi, it was conveyed that the exclusive NIA Court would become functional within this week.</p><p>In this backdrop, the Court directed the Union (NIA) to approach the Chief Justices of the High Courts and consult them for the purpose of setting up exclusive NIA Courts under Section 11 of the Act. The Chief Justices, in turn, were requested to consult the State governments and provide requisite exclusive sufficient space for establishment of the Courts, "where the Presiding Officer shall be entrusted only the trials under Section 11 of the Act".</p><p>The Court made it clear that no other case shall be entrusted to these exclusive courts and all trials pending under Section 11 before such courts shall be taken up on day-to-day basis. The Presiding Officer shall be at liberty to list the cases in the manner they want, while "ensuring that atleast 1 trial is concluded within 1 month".</p><p>The number of exclusive courts to be set up under Section 11 of the Act were delineated by the Court thus -</p><p>- Atleast 1 exclusive court for 10 pending trials;</p><p>- 2 Courts if there are over more than 15 pending trials;</p><p>- 3 Courts for more than 25 pending trials.</p><p>That is, the broad criteria shall be 1 exclusive court for 10-15 pending trials. As per the directions, the Courts shall be setup within 1 month.</p><p>The Court also directed the States to comply with its earlier directions regarding provision of additional building, etc. for setting up the Courts. Following the same, the Union shall release the necessary funds in terms of its policy decision, it said.</p><p>In response to ASG Bhati's submission on Union funding of Courts handling State-prosecuted cases, CJI Kant orally expressed that the exclusive courts set up under Section 11 of the Act may begin with NIA-prosecuted trials, and once they are over, they can take up State-prosecuted trials.</p><p>Before passing any directions
Read Original on livelaw

Analysis

Practice Questions

GS1
Easy
Prelims MCQ

न्यायिक संरचना और वैधानिक निकाय

1 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

न्यायिक सुधार और आंतरिक सुरक्षा

10 marks
6 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

न्यायिक दक्षता, केंद्र-राज्य संबंध, आंतरिक सुरक्षा

25 marks
7 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Supreme Court mandates exclusive NIA courts to fast‑track terrorism trials across India

Key Facts

  1. Supreme Court, on 8 May 2026, directed the Centre to set up exclusive NIA courts under Section 11 of the NIA Act.
  2. One exclusive court is to be created for every 10‑15 pending NIA trials; two courts for >15 trials; three courts for >25 trials.
  3. Each exclusive court must conclude at least one trial every month.
  4. CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard the suo motu case on exclusive courts for UAPA, NDPS and other special statutes.
  5. Five states have already established dedicated exclusive NIA courts; Delhi’s court to become functional within the week of 9 May 2026.
  6. The Union (NIA) must consult High Court Chief Justices and State governments for space and funding; State‑prosecuted cases may be taken up after NIA cases are cleared.

Background

The directive addresses the chronic backlog of terrorism‑related cases under statutes like the UAPA and NDPS, reflecting the judiciary's push for time‑bound disposal and inter‑governmental coordination. It ties into UPSC themes of judicial reforms, federal responsibilities, and internal security management.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Functions and responsibilities of Union and States
  • GS2 — Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functions
  • GS3 — Role of external state and non-state actors in security challenges
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning
  • Essay — Philosophy, Ethics and Human Values
  • Prelims_CSAT — Decision Making

Mains Angle

GS2 (Polity & Governance) – Discuss the Supreme Court's role in judicial reforms for special courts and assess its impact on federal‑centre cooperation and internal security.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र को हर 10‑15 मामलों... | UPSC Current Affairs