AAP Leader Sanjay Singh Seeks Disqualification of Seven Rajya Sabha Defectors to BJP

On 26 April 2026 , Sanjay Singh , the AAP leader in the Rajya Sabha , moved a petition before the Chairman C. P. Radhakrishnan seeking the disqualification of seven members who quit the AAP and announced a merger with the BJP . The petition argues that the defections breach the anti‑defection law . Key Developments Seven Rajya Sabha members, led by Raghav Chadha , resigned from AAP and declared allegiance to the BJP . Sanjay Singh filed a petition on 26 April 2026 demanding that the Chairman invoke the anti‑defection provisions to strip the defectors of their seats. The party contends that the members were elected on an AAP ticket, and their switch to the BJP violates constitutional norms. Important Facts The anti‑defection law, enshrined in the Tenth Schedule, empowers the presiding officer of a legislative house to disqualify members who voluntarily relinquish party membership or defy party directives on a vote. The petition cites precedent where similar defections led to seat vacation. The outcome will affect the numerical strength of both parties in the Upper House, where the Rajya Sabha currently has a slim majority for the ruling coalition. UPSC Relevance This episode illustrates the practical operation of the anti‑defection law , a frequent topic in GS2 (Polity). Candidates must understand the constitutional mechanism for maintaining party discipline, the role of the Chairman in adjudicating petitions, and the impact of defections on parliamentary arithmetic, which can influence legislative agendas and confidence motions. Way Forward The Chairman will examine the petition, hear representations from the accused members, and issue a ruling within the stipulated period. If disqualification is ordered, by‑elections will be triggered for the vacant seats. Both parties are likely to intensify political messaging: the AAP will stress adherence to constitutional norms, while the BJP may argue the right of elected representatives to switch allegiance. The final decision will set a precedent for future floor‑crossing cases.