Overview
The Census for 2026 has begun in Assam. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma appealed to people originally from other Indian states to mark Assamese as their mother tongue. The move aims to halt the steady decline of Assamese speakers recorded in previous censuses.
Key Developments
- CM Sarma’s appeal was made on 16 August 2026, just after the self‑enumeration phase ended.
- The appeal targets “natives of other States” – people who migrated from places like Rajasthan but now live in Assam.
- Exemptions are offered to tribal groups such as Bodos, Karbis, Misings, and to the Bengali‑speaking Barak Valley.
- The BJP, the ruling party in the state, frames the issue as protecting “native” Assamese against perceived outsiders.
Important Facts
Historical language data shows a decline in Assamese speakers: 59.53 % (1971), 57.81 % (1991), 48.80 % (2001), and 48.38 % (2011). In contrast, Bengali speakers rose from 19.7 % (1971) to 28.91 % (2011). Hindi speakers increased modestly from 5.42 % (1971) to 6.73 % (2011). The trend is expected to continue in the 2026‑27 data.
During the 1950s, many Bengali‑origin Muslims (also called Na‑Axomiyas) identified as Assamese speakers, raising the share from 31.42 % (1931) to 59.53 % (1971). Their assimilation was encouraged to counter perceived cultural dominance from Kolkata.
Exam Relevance
Understanding the census dynamics in Assam is vital for GS 3 (Demography) and GS 2 (Polity) questions on linguistic minorities, federalism, and identity politics. The political strategy of the BJP in Assam illustrates how demographic data can be used to shape electoral narratives. The role of tribal groups and the Barak Valley highlights issues of regional autonomy and affirmative action, relevant to GS 1 (Society) and GS 4 (Ethics). The term “dimagi Naxal” used by the Prime Minister reflects the central government’s stance on left‑wing extremism, a topic for GS 3 (Security) and GS 4 (Ethics).
Way Forward
1. The Census data will inform future language and cultural policies in Assam. Policymakers must balance genuine linguistic self‑identification with political pressures.
2. Greater transparency in how language data is used can reduce communal tensions and ensure that tribal rights are protected.
3. Aspirants should monitor how political parties frame demographic exercises, as this influences governance, federal‑state relations, and social cohesion.