Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

BJD MP Santrupt Misra Opposes 0.4% MDR on High-Value UPI Payments – Funding Concerns

BJD MP Santrupt Misra has challenged the Centre’s 0.4% Merchant Discount Rate on UPI payments above ₹2,000, arguing that existing RBI dividends and bank profits could fund the digital‑payment infrastructure. The debate highlights fiscal choices, merchant impacts, and relevance to UPSC economics and polity topics.
Overview \n Santrupt Misra , a Biju Janata Dal (BJD) MP, warned that the Centre’s decision to levy a MDR of 0.4% on person‑to‑merchant UPI transactions above ₹2,000 could hurt merchants and consumers. \n\n Key Developments \n \n The 0.4% fee will become effective from 15 October 2026 . \n Misra argued that the RBI gave the government a dividend of ₹2.86 lakh crore in FY 2025‑26, part of which could fund the digital‑payment infrastructure. \n He highlighted that the NPCI is owned by large banks that earned a profit of ₹2.5 lakh crore last year and could contribute to the system. \n Misra warned that merchants may cut profit margins or pass the cost to buyers, contrary to the government’s claim that consumers will not feel the impact. \n \n\n Important Facts \n The proposed MDR applies only to transactions where the amount exceeds ₹2,000 and is paid to merchants. It does not affect peer‑to‑peer transfers below that threshold. The government’s rationale is to create a sustainable funding model for the digital‑transaction infrastructure . \n\n UPSC Relevance \n This issue touches upon several GS papers. GS3 candidates should understand the role of RBI , the funding mechanisms for payment systems, and the impact of fees on market dynamics. GS2 aspirants need to note the parliamentary debate in the Rajya Sabha and the stance of a regional party. \n\n Way Forward \n Possible alternatives include: (i) allocating a portion of the RBI dividend to the payment ecosystem; (ii) asking profit‑making banks that own NPCI to fund the network; (iii) keeping the MDR at a lower rate or limiting it to specific merchant categories. A balanced approach would protect merchants, avoid price‑pass‑through to consumers, and ensure the long‑term viability of the UPI platform.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

MDR on high‑value UPI payments may strain merchants – Parliament debates funding alternatives.

Key Facts

  1. The government will levy a 0.4% MDR on UPI payments to merchants above ₹2,000 from 15 Oct 2026.
  2. RBI paid a dividend of ₹2.86 lakh crore to the Centre for FY 2025‑26.
  3. NPCI, which runs UPI, earned a profit of ₹2.5 lakh crore in FY 2025‑26.
  4. MDR applies only to person‑to‑merchant transfers; peer‑to‑peer transfers below ₹2,000 are exempt.
  5. Opposition parties argue the fee could cut merchant margins or be passed on to buyers.

Background

The move reflects the government's search for a sustainable funding model for the digital‑payment infrastructure. It raises questions about the role of the RBI, the profitability of NPCI, and the impact of transaction costs on market dynamics – all core topics in GS‑3 (economy) and GS‑2 (parliamentary debate).

UPSC Syllabus

  • Essay — Economy, Development and Inequality
  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS3 — Inclusive Growth and issues arising from it

Mains Angle

In a GS‑3 answer, candidates can evaluate the pros and cons of imposing MDR on UPI and suggest alternative financing mechanisms for the payment ecosystem.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Economy
  5. Investment & Trade
  6. BJD MP Santrupt Misra Opposes 0.4% MDR on High-Value UPI Payments – Funding Concerns
GS382% Exam RelevanceInvestment & Trade
Must Review
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

\n

Santrupt Misra, a Biju Janata Dal (BJD) MP, warned that the Centre’s decision to levy a MDR of 0.4% on person‑to‑merchant UPI transactions above ₹2,000 could hurt merchants and consumers.

\n\n

Key Developments

\n
    \n
  • The 0.4% fee will become effective from 15 October 2026.
  • \n
  • Misra argued that the RBI gave the government a dividend of ₹2.86 lakh crore in FY 2025‑26, part of which could fund the digital‑payment infrastructure.
  • \n
  • He highlighted that the NPCI is owned by large banks that earned a profit of ₹2.5 lakh crore last year and could contribute to the system.
  • \n
  • Misra warned that merchants may cut profit margins or pass the cost to buyers, contrary to the government’s claim that consumers will not feel the impact.
  • \n
\n\n

Important Facts

\n

The proposed MDR applies only to transactions where the amount exceeds ₹2,000 and is paid to merchants. It does not affect peer‑to‑peer transfers below that threshold. The government’s rationale is to create a sustainable funding model for the digital‑transaction infrastructure.

\n\n

Exam Relevance

\n

This issue touches upon several GS papers. GS3 candidates should understand the role of RBI, the funding mechanisms for payment systems, and the impact of fees on market dynamics. GS2 aspirants need to note the parliamentary debate in the Rajya Sabha and the stance of a regional party.

\n\n

Way Forward

\n

Possible alternatives include: (i) allocating a portion of the RBI dividend to the payment ecosystem; (ii) asking profit‑making banks that own NPCI to fund the network; (iii) keeping the MDR at a lower rate or limiting it to specific merchant categories. A balanced approach would protect merchants, avoid price‑pass‑through to consumers, and ensure the long‑term viability of the UPI platform.

Read Original on hindu

MDR on high‑value UPI payments may strain merchants – Parliament debates funding alternatives.

Key Facts

  1. The government will levy a 0.4% MDR on UPI payments to merchants above ₹2,000 from 15 Oct 2026.
  2. RBI paid a dividend of ₹2.86 lakh crore to the Centre for FY 2025‑26.
  3. NPCI, which runs UPI, earned a profit of ₹2.5 lakh crore in FY 2025‑26.
  4. MDR applies only to person‑to‑merchant transfers; peer‑to‑peer transfers below ₹2,000 are exempt.
  5. Opposition parties argue the fee could cut merchant margins or be passed on to buyers.

Background & Context

The move reflects the government's search for a sustainable funding model for the digital‑payment infrastructure. It raises questions about the role of the RBI, the profitability of NPCI, and the impact of transaction costs on market dynamics – all core topics in GS‑3 (economy) and GS‑2 (parliamentary debate).

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Essay•Economy, Development and InequalityPrelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS3•Inclusive Growth and issues arising from it

Mains Answer Angle

In a GS‑3 answer, candidates can evaluate the pros and cons of imposing MDR on UPI and suggest alternative financing mechanisms for the payment ecosystem.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

Prelims
Easy
Prelims MCQ

Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on UPI

1 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Medium
Mains Short Answer

Funding models for digital payment infrastructure

10 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Hard
Mains Essay

Economic implications of MDR on digital payments

20 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

BJD MP Santrupt Misra Opposes 0.4% MDR on ... | UPSC Current Affairs