Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

जस्टिस BV Nagarathna ने संवैधानिक संघवाद पर ज़ोर दिया: केंद्र‑राज्य संबंधों में कोई भेदभाव नहीं — UPSC Current Affairs | April 4, 2026
जस्टिस BV Nagarathna ने संवैधानिक संघवाद पर ज़ोर दिया: केंद्र‑राज्य संबंधों में कोई भेदभाव नहीं
Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna, Dr Rajendra Prasad Memorial Lecture में बोलते हुए, यह रेखांकित किया कि केंद्र‑राज्य संबंधों को संवैधानिक सिद्धांतों द्वारा निर्देशित होना चाहिए, न कि पार्टी राजनीति द्वारा, और किसी भी राज्य के नागरिक विकास योजनाओं में भेदभाव का सामना नहीं कर सकते। उन्होंने संघीय डिजाइन, सहयोगी संघवाद की आवश्यकता को दोहराया, और बेसिक स्ट्रक्चर सिद्धांत को संसद की अनियंत्रित शक्ति के खिलाफ एक सुरक्षा के रूप में उजागर किया।
Overview Speaking at the 1st Dr Rajendra Prasad Memorial Lecture at Chanakya National Law University, Patna, Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna warned that the relationship between the Union and the States must be rooted in the Constitution and not in the political fortunes of any party. She asserted that citizens of a state cannot be discriminated against in development programmes and called for a cooperative, dialogue‑based federalism. Key Developments The Centre should treat States as coordinates, not subordinates . Political party differences must be set aside; constitutional governance supersedes partisan considerations. Discriminatory "pick‑and‑choose" approaches in development schemes are unconstitutional; equity must guide policy implementation. Increasing friction between the Union and States weakens cooperative federalism and should be resolved through dialogue, not litigation. The Constitution does not vest ultimate trust in any single institution; it relies on a system of checks and balances. Historical jurisprudence – from Shankari Prasad and Golak Nath – to the Kesavananda Bharati judgment, the Court has reinforced constitutional limits on legislative power. Important Constitutional Provisions Article 13 restricts Parliament’s legislative competence. Articles 245‑246 allocate law‑making authority. Seventh Schedule outline
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. जस्टिस BV Nagarathna ने संवैधानिक संघवाद पर ज़ोर दिया: केंद्र‑राज्य संबंधों में कोई भेदभाव नहीं
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

<h2>Overview</h2> <p>Speaking at the 1st <span class="key-term" data-definition="Dr Rajendra Prasad Memorial Lecture – an annual lecture series on constitutional issues organized by Chanakya National Law University (GS2: Polity)">Dr Rajendra Prasad Memorial Lecture</span> at Chanakya National Law University, Patna, <strong>Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna</strong> warned that the relationship between the Union and the States must be rooted in the Constitution and not in the political fortunes of any party. She asserted that citizens of a state cannot be discriminated against in development programmes and called for a cooperative, dialogue‑based federalism.</p> <h3>Key Developments</h3> <ul> <li>The Centre should treat States as <span class="key-term" data-definition="Centre‑State relations – the constitutional framework governing the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the Union and the States (GS2: Polity)">coordinates, not subordinates</span>.</li> <li>Political party differences must be set aside; constitutional governance supersedes partisan considerations.</li> <li>Discriminatory "pick‑and‑choose" approaches in development schemes are unconstitutional; equity must guide policy implementation.</li> <li>Increasing friction between the Union and States weakens cooperative federalism and should be resolved through dialogue, not litigation.</li> <li>The Constitution does not vest ultimate trust in any single institution; it relies on a system of checks and balances.</li> <li>Historical jurisprudence – from <span class="key-term" data-definition="Shankari Prasad (1951) & Sajjan Singh (1965) – Supreme Court cases that initially upheld Parliament’s plenary amending power (GS2: Polity)">Shankari Prasad</span> and <span class="key-term" data-definition="Golak Nath (1967) – Supreme Court case that first attempted to limit Parliament’s amending power (GS2: Polity)">Golak Nath</span> – to the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Kesavananda Bharati (1973) – landmark Supreme Court case that introduced the Basic Structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to alter the Constitution’s essential features (GS2: Polity)">Kesavananda Bharati</span> judgment, the Court has reinforced constitutional limits on legislative power.</li> </ul> <h3>Important Constitutional Provisions</h3> <ul> <li><span class="key-term" data-definition="Article 13 – clause that invalidates any law inconsistent with the Constitution’s fundamental rights (GS2: Polity)">Article 13</span> restricts Parliament’s legislative competence.</li> <li><span class="key-term" data-definition="Article 245 & 246 – define the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States (GS2: Polity)">Articles 245‑246</span> allocate law‑making authority.</li> <li><span class="key-term" data-definition="Seventh Schedule – contains the Union, State and Concurrent Lists that delineate subjects of legislation (GS2: Polity)">Seventh Schedule</span> outline
Read Original on livelaw

Analysis

Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT