Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
CPI(M) Slams NFSA Amendment Shifting AAY E... | UPSC Current Affairs

CPI(M) Slams NFSA Amendment Shifting AAY Entitlement to Per‑Capita Basis — Implications for Food Security

The CPI(M) has denounced a proposed amendment to the National Food Security Act that would shift Antyodaya Anna Yojana entitlement from a household‑based to a per‑capita system, arguing it harms the poorest. The change caps food‑grain allocation at 35 kg per household, risking reduced benefits for larger families and affecting states with smaller household sizes, while outdated 2011 Census data leaves millions excluded.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) – CPI(M) has condemned a proposed amendment to the National Food Security Act (NFSA) that would change the entitlement criteria of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) from a household‑based to a per‑capita system. The party alleges that the move is "anti‑poor" and seeks an immediate withdrawal. Key Developments The government proposes raising the per‑person food‑grain entitlement from 5 kg to 7 kg per month. Under the amendment, the total entitlement will remain capped at 35 kg per household, irrespective of family size. CPI(M) warns that larger families will lose the benefit of the current 35 kg guarantee, while smaller families will see a reduction in their share. The party argues that the change will disproportionately hurt the poorest, including elderly couples, widows, persons with disabilities, tribal families, land‑less labourers, daily‑wage workers, chronically ill patients and small nuclear families. Important Facts The amendment would affect states that have successfully implemented family planning programmes . Southern states, which now have smaller average household sizes, could see a sharp decline in overall food‑grain allocations despite their achievements in population stabilisation. Moreover, the beneficiary list for the NFSA still relies on the 2011 Census . Estimates suggest that about 14 crore eligible persons remain excluded because of this outdated data. UPSC Relevance Understanding this issue touches upon several GS papers. Food grain entitlement is a core component of India’s food‑security architecture, linking to welfare economics, public distribution system (PDS) reforms, and the right to food. The political debate highlights the role of opposition parties in policy scrutiny (GS2:
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

CPI(M) warns per‑capita AAY shift will hurt large poor families and test food‑security policy.

Key Facts

  1. NFSA संशोधन प्रस्तावित करता है कि प्रति व्यक्ति अनाज अधिकार को 5 kg से बढ़ाकर 7 kg प्रति माह किया जाए।
  2. कुल AAY अधिकार प्रति घर 35 kg तक सीमित रहेगा, चाहे परिवार का आकार कुछ भी हो।
  3. बड़े परिवार प्रत्येक सदस्य को कम अनाज प्राप्त करेंगे; छोटे परिवारों को कुल हिस्से में कमी दिखेगी।
  4. CPI(M) इस कदम को "anti‑poor" कहता है और इसकी वापसी की मांग करता है।
  5. लगभग 14 करोड़ पात्र व्यक्तियों को बाहर रखा गया है क्योंकि NFSA लाभार्थी सूची अभी भी 2011 जनगणना का उपयोग करती है।
  6. छोटे औसत घर वाले दक्षिणी राज्यों को सफल परिवार नियोजन कार्यक्रमों के बावजूद अनाज आवंटन में कमी हो सकती है।

Background

The amendment touches on India's food‑security architecture under the National Food Security Act, linking welfare economics, the Public Distribution System, and the right to food. It also raises governance issues about updating beneficiary databases and the role of opposition parties in scrutinising welfare reforms.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — National Current Affairs
  • GS2 — Issues relating to poverty and hunger
  • GS3 — Farm subsidies, MSP, PDS, food security and technology missions
  • GS1 — Population and Associated Issues
  • Essay — Environment and Sustainability
  • GS2 — Functions and responsibilities of Union and States

Mains Angle

GS2 (Social Sector & Development) – discuss the implications of shifting AAY entitlement to a per‑capita model and evaluate how data accuracy and political opposition shape food‑security policy.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Economy
  5. CPI(M) Slams NFSA Amendment Shifting AAY Entitlement to Per‑Capita Basis — Implications for Food Security
GS272% Exam Relevance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) – CPI(M) has condemned a proposed amendment to the National Food Security Act (NFSA) that would change the entitlement criteria of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) from a household‑based to a per‑capita system. The party alleges that the move is "anti‑poor" and seeks an immediate withdrawal.

Key Developments

  • The government proposes raising the per‑person food‑grain entitlement from 5 kg to 7 kg per month.
  • Under the amendment, the total entitlement will remain capped at 35 kg per household, irrespective of family size.
  • CPI(M) warns that larger families will lose the benefit of the current 35 kg guarantee, while smaller families will see a reduction in their share.
  • The party argues that the change will disproportionately hurt the poorest, including elderly couples, widows, persons with disabilities, tribal families, land‑less labourers, daily‑wage workers, chronically ill patients and small nuclear families.

Important Facts

The amendment would affect states that have successfully implemented family planning programmes. Southern states, which now have smaller average household sizes, could see a sharp decline in overall food‑grain allocations despite their achievements in population stabilisation. Moreover, the beneficiary list for the NFSA still relies on the 2011 Census. Estimates suggest that about 14 crore eligible persons remain excluded because of this outdated data.

Exam Relevance

Understanding this issue touches upon several GS papers. Food grain entitlement is a core component of India’s food‑security architecture, linking to welfare economics, public distribution system (PDS) reforms, and the right to food. The political debate highlights the role of opposition parties in policy scrutiny (GS2:

Read Original on hindu

CPI(M) warns per‑capita AAY shift will hurt large poor families and test food‑security policy.

Key Facts

  1. NFSA संशोधन प्रस्तावित करता है कि प्रति व्यक्ति अनाज अधिकार को 5 kg से बढ़ाकर 7 kg प्रति माह किया जाए।
  2. कुल AAY अधिकार प्रति घर 35 kg तक सीमित रहेगा, चाहे परिवार का आकार कुछ भी हो।
  3. बड़े परिवार प्रत्येक सदस्य को कम अनाज प्राप्त करेंगे; छोटे परिवारों को कुल हिस्से में कमी दिखेगी।
  4. CPI(M) इस कदम को "anti‑poor" कहता है और इसकी वापसी की मांग करता है।
  5. लगभग 14 करोड़ पात्र व्यक्तियों को बाहर रखा गया है क्योंकि NFSA लाभार्थी सूची अभी भी 2011 जनगणना का उपयोग करती है।
  6. छोटे औसत घर वाले दक्षिणी राज्यों को सफल परिवार नियोजन कार्यक्रमों के बावजूद अनाज आवंटन में कमी हो सकती है।

Background & Context

The amendment touches on India's food‑security architecture under the National Food Security Act, linking welfare economics, the Public Distribution System, and the right to food. It also raises governance issues about updating beneficiary databases and the role of opposition parties in scrutinising welfare reforms.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•National Current AffairsGS2•Issues relating to poverty and hungerGS3•Farm subsidies, MSP, PDS, food security and technology missionsGS1•Population and Associated IssuesEssay•Environment and SustainabilityGS2•Functions and responsibilities of Union and States

Mains Answer Angle

GS2 (Social Sector & Development) – discuss the implications of shifting AAY entitlement to a per‑capita model and evaluate how data accuracy and political opposition shape food‑security policy.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Food security and welfare schemes

1 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Impact of policy change on vulnerable groups

5 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Food security policy and governance

20 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.