Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

ECI’s Special Intensive Revision Sparks Internal Dissent and Voter Deletions – Calls for Audit and CEC Resignation

Internal dissent within the Election Commission of India over the Special Intensive Revision has led to massive voter deletions, especially in West Bengal, prompting calls for a database audit and the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The Supreme Court’s recent criticism of the CEC selection pro…
The recent probe by Election Commission of India (ECI) into its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has revealed deep‑seated dissent within the commission and large‑scale voter deletions. Key Developments Two Election Commissioners , Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi , recorded at least 14 objections between Oct 2025 and Aug 2026, saying many decisions were taken without their knowledge. In May, Commissioner Joshi warned that Form 6 could not be altered without a rule change, yet July’s version added illegal questions about past roll inclusion. Commissioners flagged the centralisation of the voter database, demanded an audit, and noted that field officers lacked full access to the ERONet portal . In West Bengal, about 60 lakh electors were marked with “logical discrepancies”; 27 lakh names were deleted, and over 90% of appealed deletions were later restored. In Delhi, 24 of 70 constituencies now show fewer electors in draft rolls than the number who voted a year and a half ago. Important Facts The Supreme Court, through a two‑judge bench led by Justice Dipankar Datta , held that the 2023 amendment replacing the Chief Justice of India on the CEC selection panel with a Union Minister fails the “perception test”. The same panel appointed Gyanesh Kumar as Chief Election Commissioner . Earlier, the Court had upheld the SIR without questioning its design, which shifts the burden of proving eligibility onto citizens, undermining the principle of universal adult franchise . UPSC Relevance Understanding the internal dynamics of the ECI is crucial for GS 2 (Polity). The case illustrates how administrative decisions, legal interpretations, and political appointments intersect, affecting the integrity of the electoral process—a core topic for questions on democratic institutions, electoral reforms, and the rule of law. Way Forward Immediate audit of the central voter database to verify deletions. Suspension of further deletions until audit completion. Resignation of Gyanesh Kumar to restore confidence in the commission. Legislative review of the SIR mechanism to ensure due‑process verification and compliance with the constitutional guarantee of voting rights. These steps are essential to safeguard India’s democratic fabric and to align electoral administration with constitutional mandates.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

ECI’s internal dissent over SIR threatens electoral roll credibility and democratic trust

Key Facts

  1. Two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, logged at least 14 objections between Oct 2025 and Aug 2026.
  2. Commissioner Joshi warned in May 2026 that Form 6 cannot be altered without a rule change; the July 2026 version added illegal questions on past roll inclusion.
  3. In West Bengal, about 60 lakh electors were flagged with ‘logical discrepancies’; 27 lakh names were deleted, and over 90% of appealed deletions were later restored.
  4. In Delhi, 24 of 70 constituencies now show fewer electors in draft rolls than the number who voted in the 2025 election.
  5. The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Dipankar Datta (2026) held that the 2023 amendment replacing the CJI on the CEC selection panel with a Union Minister fails the ‘perception test’, questioning CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s appointment.

Background

The Election Commission of India (ECI) conducts Special Intensive Revision to update electoral rolls before elections. The process is meant to be transparent and protect the constitutional right of universal adult franchise, but internal dissent and procedural lapses raise concerns about governance, accountability, and the independence of constitutional bodies.

UPSC Syllabus

  • GS2 — Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functions
  • Essay — Democracy, Governance and Public Administration
  • Prelims_GS — Public Policy and Rights Issues
  • GS2 — Functions and responsibilities of Union and States
  • GS2 — Devolution of powers and finances to local levels

Mains Angle

GS 2 – Discuss how internal disagreements within the Election Commission affect the legitimacy of electoral roll revisions and suggest reforms to strengthen institutional checks.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Legislation & Institutional Governance
  6. ECI’s Special Intensive Revision Sparks Internal Dissent and Voter Deletions – Calls for Audit and CEC Resignation
GS280% Exam RelevanceLegislation & Institutional Governance
Must Review
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

The recent probe by Election Commission of India (ECI) into its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has revealed deep‑seated dissent within the commission and large‑scale voter deletions.

Key Developments

  • Two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, recorded at least 14 objections between Oct 2025 and Aug 2026, saying many decisions were taken without their knowledge.
  • In May, Commissioner Joshi warned that Form 6 could not be altered without a rule change, yet July’s version added illegal questions about past roll inclusion.
  • Commissioners flagged the centralisation of the voter database, demanded an audit, and noted that field officers lacked full access to the ERONet portal.
  • In West Bengal, about 60 lakh electors were marked with “logical discrepancies”; 27 lakh names were deleted, and over 90% of appealed deletions were later restored.
  • In Delhi, 24 of 70 constituencies now show fewer electors in draft rolls than the number who voted a year and a half ago.

Important Facts

The Supreme Court, through a two‑judge bench led by Justice Dipankar Datta, held that the 2023 amendment replacing the Chief Justice of India on the CEC selection panel with a Union Minister fails the “perception test”. The same panel appointed Gyanesh Kumar as Chief Election Commissioner. Earlier, the Court had upheld the SIR without questioning its design, which shifts the burden of proving eligibility onto citizens, undermining the principle of universal adult franchise.

Exam Relevance

Understanding the internal dynamics of the ECI is crucial for GS 2 (Polity). The case illustrates how administrative decisions, legal interpretations, and political appointments intersect, affecting the integrity of the electoral process—a core topic for questions on democratic institutions, electoral reforms, and the rule of law.

Way Forward

  • Immediate audit of the central voter database to verify deletions.
  • Suspension of further deletions until audit completion.
  • Resignation of Gyanesh Kumar to restore confidence in the commission.
  • Legislative review of the SIR mechanism to ensure due‑process verification and compliance with the constitutional guarantee of voting rights.

These steps are essential to safeguard India’s democratic fabric and to align electoral administration with constitutional mandates.

Read Original on hindu

ECI’s internal dissent over SIR threatens electoral roll credibility and democratic trust

Key Facts

  1. Two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, logged at least 14 objections between Oct 2025 and Aug 2026.
  2. Commissioner Joshi warned in May 2026 that Form 6 cannot be altered without a rule change; the July 2026 version added illegal questions on past roll inclusion.
  3. In West Bengal, about 60 lakh electors were flagged with ‘logical discrepancies’; 27 lakh names were deleted, and over 90% of appealed deletions were later restored.
  4. In Delhi, 24 of 70 constituencies now show fewer electors in draft rolls than the number who voted in the 2025 election.
  5. The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Dipankar Datta (2026) held that the 2023 amendment replacing the CJI on the CEC selection panel with a Union Minister fails the ‘perception test’, questioning CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s appointment.

Background & Context

The Election Commission of India (ECI) conducts Special Intensive Revision to update electoral rolls before elections. The process is meant to be transparent and protect the constitutional right of universal adult franchise, but internal dissent and procedural lapses raise concerns about governance, accountability, and the independence of constitutional bodies.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

GS2•Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functionsEssay•Democracy, Governance and Public AdministrationPrelims_GS•Public Policy and Rights IssuesGS2•Functions and responsibilities of Union and StatesGS2•Devolution of powers and finances to local levels

Mains Answer Angle

GS 2 – Discuss how internal disagreements within the Election Commission affect the legitimacy of electoral roll revisions and suggest reforms to strengthen institutional checks.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

Prelims
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Electoral reforms – Form 6 amendment procedure

1 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Internal dissent in ECI over SIR

5 marks
6 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Electoral roll integrity and democratic governance

20 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

ECI’s Special Intensive Revision Sparks In... | UPSC Current Affairs