<h2>Overview</h2>
<p>In <strong>FY 2024-25</strong>, electoral trusts received a total of <strong>₹3,826.34 crore</strong> in contributions and disbursed <strong>₹3,826.35 crore</strong> to political parties, as reported by the <strong>Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR)</strong> on <strong>13 February 2026</strong>. The data highlights the dominance of the <strong>Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)</strong>, which secured more than <strong>82 %</strong> of the funds, raising crucial questions about transparency, compliance, and the impact of the now‑scrapped electoral bonds scheme.</p>
<h3>Key Developments</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Dominant share to BJP:</strong> The BJP received <strong>₹3,157.65 crore</strong> (82.52% of total disbursements), dwarfing other parties.</li>
<li><strong>Trust performance:</strong> <em>Prudent Electoral Trust</em> disbursed the highest amount – <strong>₹2,668.46 crore</strong> to 15 parties; <em>Progressive Electoral Trust</em> followed with <strong>₹914.97 crore</strong> to 10 parties.</li>
<li><strong>Compliance gaps:</strong> Five trusts failed to upload reports on the Election Commission portal, and one trust (Harmony Electoral Trust) disbursed ₹10 lakh more than it received, indicating lapses in adherence to the <strong>Electoral Trusts Scheme, 2013</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Important Facts</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Total donors:</strong> <strong>228 corporate entities</strong> contributed <strong>₹3,636.82 crore</strong> and <strong>99 individuals</strong> donated <strong>₹187.62 crore</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Top donors:</strong> <em>Elevated Avenue Realty LLP</em> alone gave <strong>₹500 crore</strong>, followed by <em>Tata Sons Pvt Ltd</em> (<strong>₹308.13 crore</strong>), <em>TCS Ltd</em> (<strong>₹217.62 crore</strong>) and <em>Megha Engineering</em> (<strong>₹175 crore</strong>).</li>
<li><strong>Sectoral share:</strong> Manufacturing contributed the largest portion – <strong>₹1,063.13 crore (27.78 %)</strong>, followed by real‑estate (<strong>₹629.17 crore</strong>) and IT/telecom (<strong>₹451.86 crore</strong>).</li>
<li><strong>Geographic concentration:</strong> Maharashtra was the top source of contributions with <strong>₹1,225.43 crore</strong>, while contributions worth <strong>₹1,065.2 crore</strong> lacked donor address details.</li>
</ul>
<h3>UPSC Relevance</h3>
<p>This topic intersects with the UPSC syllabus across multiple dimensions: <strong>Polity & Governance</strong> (electoral reforms, role of Election Commission, political funding regulations), <strong>Economics</strong> (corporate political contributions, impact on fiscal transparency), and <strong>Ethics & Integrity</strong> (issues of accountability and transparency). Questions may probe the effectiveness of the <em>Electoral Trusts Scheme</em>, compare it with the defunct <em>electoral bonds</em>, or assess the implications of disproportionate funding on democratic fairness.</p>
<h3>Way Forward</h3>
<p>To strengthen the credibility of political financing, the ADR recommends stricter enforcement of EC guidelines, mandatory public disclosure of corporate contributions via company filings, and punitive action against trusts that breach the 95 % disbursement rule. As the Supreme Court’s 2024 judgment invalidated the electoral bonds, the focus now shifts to ensuring that electoral trusts operate with full transparency, thereby safeguarding the voters’ right to information.</p>