Finance Ministry’s FC‑16 Memorandum: 41% Share Kept, Structural Reforms Deferred The Finance Commission (FC‑16) report was tabled on 1 February 2026 . While the Union accepted the headline recommendation of a 41% share of the divisible pool , it deferred several structural measures, signalling a shift towards fiscal predictability for the Centre at the cost of State‑level reforms. Key Developments Retention of the 41% share for States, but the pool has been shrinking from 89.2% (FC‑13) to 78.3% (FC‑15) of gross tax revenues. Horizontal devolution formula changed: tax‑and‑fiscal‑effort criterion (2.5%) replaced by contribution‑to‑GDP criterion (10%) , favouring high‑GDP states. Local‑body grants split into basic and performance components, with multiple compliance conditions that disadvantage weaker states. Structural reforms such as amendment of the Fiscal Responsibility Legislation , control of off‑budget borrowings , and power‑sector restructuring were postponed. GST compensation ended in June 2022, leaving States without the guaranteed 14% annual growth in SGST revenues. Important Facts The memorandum accepted the quantum of borrowing ceilings but noted that off‑budget controls, FRL amendments, and the Centre’s own fiscal deficit path would be examined "separately" – a euphemism for "later". States such as Tamil Nadu face a projected shortfall of nearly ₹20,000 crore in 2024‑25 due to the GST‑compensation gap. Debt‑to‑GSDP ratios illustrate the stress: Punjab 42.9% , Rajasthan 37.9% , West Bengal 38.3% , and Andhra Pradesh 34.6% (2023‑24). These figures coexist with weak enforcement of existing fiscal rules. UPSC Relevance Understanding FC‑16 is crucial for centre‑state fiscal federalism . Aspirants should note how the shift from effort‑based to weight‑based devolution alters the equalisation logic, impacting states with lower per‑capita income (e.g., Bihar, Uttar Pradesh). The deferral of structural reforms raises questions about fiscal discipline, debt sustainability, and the effectiveness of the State Finance Commission in enforcing fiscal prudence. Way Forward Re‑evaluate the composition of the divisible pool to include cesses and surcharges, ensuring the 41% share reflects total tax collections. Re‑introduce a performance‑linked, but less onerous, conditionality for local‑body grants to avoid penalising fiscally weak states. Amend the Fiscal Responsibility Legislation to incorporate explicit controls on off‑budget liabilities. Design a replacement mechanism for GST compensation that accounts for differential growth capacities of States. Strengthen enforcement of existing fiscal rules through a binding mechanism in the next Finance Commission report. For UPSC candidates, the FC‑16 episode illustrates the tension between fiscal centralisation and the constitutional mandate of cooperative federalism, a theme recurrent in GS‑2 (Polity) and GS‑3 (Economy) papers.