The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar faced a historic parliamentary motion on 13 March 2026 when the INDIA bloc submitted a 10‑page notice in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha . The notice, signed by 130 MPs in the Lok Sabha and 63 in the Rajya Sabha, lists seven charges ranging from partisan conduct to alleged obstruction of electoral fraud investigations. Key Developments Submission of a formal notice seeking removal of the CEC for the first time in Parliament. Charges include "partisan and discriminatory conduct," "deliberate obstruction of investigation of electoral fraud," and "mass disenfranchisement." Opposition alleges misuse of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) to favour the ruling BJP, citing cases in West Bengal and Bihar. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) considered releasing the transcript of its February 2 meeting with the Election Commission, after which Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee claimed the CEC had "insulted" and "humiliated" the delegation. Procedural requirement: at least 100 signatures in the Lok Sabha or 50 in the Rajya Sabha; the notice comfortably exceeds both thresholds. Important Facts Article 324(5) of the Constitution protects the CEC’s tenure, mirroring the removal process for Supreme Court judges. Under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 , a joint committee must be formed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha if the motion is admitted in both Houses. If the motion is admitted, the committee investigates the charges and submits a report to both Houses for a vote. The notice’s 130 Lok Sabha signatures represent roughly 9% of the total 543 members, indicating significant cross‑party concern. UPSC Relevance This episode illustrates several core UPSC themes: the constitutional safeguards ensuring the independence of constitutional functionaries (Article 324(5)), the parliamentary procedure for removal of high‑level officials (Judges (Inquiry) Act), and the political dynamics surrounding electoral administration. Understanding the role of the Election Commission and its head is essential for GS‑2 (Polity) questions on democratic institutions, federalism, and the balance of power between the executive and independent bodies. Way Forward Should both Houses admit the motion, a joint inquiry committee will be constituted to examine the seven charges. The committee’s findings will determine whether a simple majority vote can remove the CEC, a step that could set a precedent for future accountability of constitutional officers. Meanwhile, opposition parties are likely to intensify scrutiny of the SIR process, demanding greater transparency to allay concerns of partisan bias. Aspirants should monitor the parliamentary debate, the composition of the inquiry committee, and any subsequent judicial review, as these developments will enrich answers on constitutional law, electoral reforms, and the functioning of India’s democratic institutions.