Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

India’s Evolving Counter‑Terror Strategy: From Passive Posture to Operation Sindoor and PRAHAAR Policy

India shifted from a passive, diplomatic response to cross‑border terrorism to a proactive stance marked by surgical strikes, Operation Sindoor (2025), and the 2026 PRAHAAR policy, now treating Pakistan‑backed attacks as acts of war and adopting a four‑fold counter‑terror strategy.
Overview Since the 9/11 attacks, the nature of terrorism and the way nations respond have changed dramatically. India, which faced its first major cross‑border terror incident in the early 1990s, moved from a largely reactive stance to a proactive, cross‑border approach. The shift became evident after 2014, culminating in the 2025 Operation Sindoor and the launch of the PRAHAAR policy. Key Developments (Bullet Points) 2016: First surgical strikes in Uri after a JeM attack. 2019: Indian Air Force strikes on a JeM camp in Balakot, marking the first cross‑border air operation. 2025: Operation Sindoor (May 6‑7) targeted the leadership of LeT and JeM , destroying their headquarters and Pakistani assets. 2026: Unveiling of PRAHAAR , a comprehensive national counter‑terrorism framework. Important Facts India’s early response to cross‑border terrorism was limited to diplomatic protests and occasional arrests. The Operation Parakram after the 2001 Parliament attack showed the difficulty of punitive action when nuclear‑armed neighbours are involved. Subsequent attacks—such as the 2008 Mumbai 26/11 attacks, the 2016 Uri strike, and the 2025 Pahalgam blast—prompted a doctrinal shift to treat any Pakistan‑backed terror act as an act of war . UPSC Relevance Understanding India’s counter‑terrorism evolution is essential for GS2 (Polity) and GS3 (Security). Candidates should note how international events like 9/11 influenced domestic policy, the role of the LoC in facilitating infiltration, and the legal‑political implications of labeling attacks as acts of war. Way Forward India’s four‑fold strategy emphasizes: (1) continued elimination of residual terror networks in Kashmir; (2) pre‑emptive strikes on launch pads across the LoC ; (3) a nationwide de‑radicalisation programme to deter youth recruitment; and (4) robust disruption of terror financing through international cooperation. The success of PRAHAAR will depend on coordinated action across ministries, civil society, and foreign partners.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

India’s proactive counter‑terror shift: Operation Sindoor and PRAHAAR reshape security policy.

Key Facts

  1. 2016 – India carried out surgical strikes in Uri after a JeM attack, marking the first limited cross‑border strike.
  2. 2019 – Indian Air Force bombed a JeM training camp in Balakot, the first cross‑border air operation.
  3. May 6‑7, 2025 – Operation Sindoor targeted LeT and JeM leadership, destroying their headquarters in Pakistan.
  4. February 2026 – PRAHAAR policy was launched as a whole‑of‑government counter‑terrorism framework.
  5. Post‑26/11, India classifies any Pakistan‑backed terror act as an ‘act of war’, enabling military response.

Background

The evolution of terrorism after 9/11 forced India to rethink its security doctrine. From diplomatic protests to surgical strikes, the shift aligns with GS‑2 (India‑Pakistan relations) and GS‑3 (internal security, cyber‑security, and counter‑terrorism) syllabi.

UPSC Syllabus

  • GS3 — Role of external state and non-state actors in security challenges
  • Essay — International Relations and Geopolitics
  • GS3 — Cyber security and communication networks in internal security
  • GS2 — India and its neighborhood relations
  • GS3 — Various security forces and agencies
  • Prelims_GS — National Current Affairs
  • Prelims_GS — International Current Affairs
  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Government policies and interventions for development
  • GS3 — Border management and organized crime

Mains Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how PRAHAAR institutionalises a proactive, multi‑agency response to cross‑border terror, linking it to GS‑2 (foreign policy) and GS‑3 (internal security). A likely question could ask you to evaluate the effectiveness of India’s post‑26/11 policy changes.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Defence
  5. India’s Evolving Counter‑Terror Strategy: From Passive Posture to Operation Sindoor and PRAHAAR Policy
GS273% Exam Relevance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

Since the 9/11 attacks, the nature of terrorism and the way nations respond have changed dramatically. India, which faced its first major cross‑border terror incident in the early 1990s, moved from a largely reactive stance to a proactive, cross‑border approach. The shift became evident after 2014, culminating in the 2025 Operation Sindoor and the launch of the PRAHAAR policy.

Key Developments (Bullet Points)

  • 2016: First surgical strikes in Uri after a JeM attack.
  • 2019: Indian Air Force strikes on a JeM camp in Balakot, marking the first cross‑border air operation.
  • 2025: Operation Sindoor (May 6‑7) targeted the leadership of LeT and JeM, destroying their headquarters and Pakistani assets.
  • 2026: Unveiling of PRAHAAR, a comprehensive national counter‑terrorism framework.

Important Facts

India’s early response to cross‑border terrorism was limited to diplomatic protests and occasional arrests. The Operation Parakram after the 2001 Parliament attack showed the difficulty of punitive action when nuclear‑armed neighbours are involved. Subsequent attacks—such as the 2008 Mumbai 26/11 attacks, the 2016 Uri strike, and the 2025 Pahalgam blast—prompted a doctrinal shift to treat any Pakistan‑backed terror act as an act of war.

Exam Relevance

Understanding India’s counter‑terrorism evolution is essential for GS2 (Polity) and GS3 (Security). Candidates should note how international events like 9/11 influenced domestic policy, the role of the LoC in facilitating infiltration, and the legal‑political implications of labeling attacks as acts of war.

Way Forward

India’s four‑fold strategy emphasizes: (1) continued elimination of residual terror networks in Kashmir; (2) pre‑emptive strikes on launch pads across the LoC; (3) a nationwide de‑radicalisation programme to deter youth recruitment; and (4) robust disruption of terror financing through international cooperation. The success of PRAHAAR will depend on coordinated action across ministries, civil society, and foreign partners.

Read Original on hindu

India’s proactive counter‑terror shift: Operation Sindoor and PRAHAAR reshape security policy.

Key Facts

  1. 2016 – India carried out surgical strikes in Uri after a JeM attack, marking the first limited cross‑border strike.
  2. 2019 – Indian Air Force bombed a JeM training camp in Balakot, the first cross‑border air operation.
  3. May 6‑7, 2025 – Operation Sindoor targeted LeT and JeM leadership, destroying their headquarters in Pakistan.
  4. February 2026 – PRAHAAR policy was launched as a whole‑of‑government counter‑terrorism framework.
  5. Post‑26/11, India classifies any Pakistan‑backed terror act as an ‘act of war’, enabling military response.

Background & Context

The evolution of terrorism after 9/11 forced India to rethink its security doctrine. From diplomatic protests to surgical strikes, the shift aligns with GS‑2 (India‑Pakistan relations) and GS‑3 (internal security, cyber‑security, and counter‑terrorism) syllabi.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

GS3•Role of external state and non-state actors in security challengesEssay•International Relations and GeopoliticsGS3•Cyber security and communication networks in internal securityGS2•India and its neighborhood relationsGS3•Various security forces and agenciesPrelims_GS•National Current AffairsPrelims_GS•International Current AffairsPrelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Government policies and interventions for developmentGS3•Border management and organized crime

Mains Answer Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how PRAHAAR institutionalises a proactive, multi‑agency response to cross‑border terror, linking it to GS‑2 (foreign policy) and GS‑3 (internal security). A likely question could ask you to evaluate the effectiveness of India’s post‑26/11 policy changes.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

Prelims
Easy
Prelims MCQ

Recent security operations

1 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Medium
Mains Short Answer

National security policy

10 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

India‑Pakistan relations and internal security

25 marks
7 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

India’s Evolving Counter‑Terror Strategy: ... | UPSC Current Affairs