In a keynote address at the NLUI‑SBA Law Conclave 2026, Justice NK Singh emphasized that the Constitution of India never labels the nation as a Hindu State. He traced the etymology of Hindu to a geographical label rather than a religious one, and called for a broader inclusion of Indian philosophical traditions in legal education.
Key Developments
- Justice Singh clarified that most world constitutions explicitly endorse a faith (e.g., Christian or Islamic states), whereas India remains secular and pluralistic.
- He highlighted that the word Hindu was a foreign designation for peoples beyond the Indus, predating the organized religion we know today.
- The judge praised the ancient Mimamsa school as evidence of India’s sophisticated philosophical heritage, contrasting it with colonial stereotypes such as “land of snake‑charmers”.
- He cited the British‑era Criminal Tribes Act to illustrate how colonial legislation undermined India’s indigenous legal traditions.
- Referencing the Mahabharata, Singh urged law schools to study dialogues such as Sulabha‑Janaka on the qualities of a debater.
Important Facts
Singh noted that during the Roman attacks on Jerusalem, Jewish communities migrated to India and were allowed to practice their faith, as evidenced by the historic Cochin synagogue. Similarly, Zoroastrian refugees from Persia found sanctuary in India, preserving their religious customs. These examples underscore India’s long‑standing tradition of religious tolerance, predating the modern concept of secularism.
UPSC Relevance
The remarks intersect with multiple GS papers. For GS‑2 (Polity), understanding the secular character of the