Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

President Appoints Three Additional Judges to Andhra Pradesh High Court – 2026

On 3 July 2026, the President of India, after consulting the Chief Justice of India, appointed Smt. Sunitha Gandham, Shri Alapati Giridhar, and Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi as Additional Judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The move, made under constitutional provisions, aims to address case backlogs and underscores the executive's role in judicial appointments, a key topic for UPSC Polity preparation.
Overview The President of India, after consulting the Chief Justice of India , has appointed three new Additional Judges to the Andhra Pradesh High Court . The appointments were made under the powers granted by the Constitution of India . Key Developments Smt. Sunitha Gandham appointed as an Additional Judge. Shri Alapati Giridhar appointed as an Additional Judge. Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi (also known as Ch. Purushottama Kumar (Jagannath Srinivasan)) appointed as an Additional Judge. Important Facts The appointments were announced on 03 July 2026 by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) in Delhi. All three judges will serve on a temporary basis to help clear the growing case backlog in the High Court. The decision reflects the central government's effort to strengthen the judiciary at the state level. UPSC Relevance Understanding judicial appointments is crucial for GS‑2 aspirants. The process illustrates the separation of powers, the role of the executive in judicial selections, and the constitutional safeguards that ensure independence of the judiciary. Candidates should note how the President’s powers are exercised in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, a practice established by the collegium system . Moreover, the appointment of Additional Judges highlights the judiciary’s response to case backlogs, a recurring theme in governance and legal reforms. Way Forward While the three appointments will provide immediate relief, long‑term solutions require: Increasing the number of permanent judges to match the growing population and case load. Strengthening infrastructure and digitisation of court processes to speed up case disposal. Periodic review of the collegium system to enhance transparency and accountability. For UPSC preparation, students should track similar appointments across states, compare the use of Additional Judges versus permanent judges, and analyse how these moves affect the efficiency of the Indian judicial system.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

President appoints three Additional Judges to ease Andhra Pradesh High Court backlog

Key Facts

  1. President appointed three Additional Judges to Andhra Pradesh High Court on 03 July 2026.
  2. The judges are Smt. Sunitha Gandham, Shri Alapati Giridhar and Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi.
  3. Appointments were made after consultation with the Chief Justice of India.
  4. Additional Judges are temporary judges, usually for up to two years, to reduce case backlog.
  5. The power to appoint High Court judges comes from Article 217 of the Constitution; Article 224 deals with Additional Judges.
  6. The appointments were announced by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) in Delhi.
  7. The move reflects the central government's effort to strengthen state‑level judiciary.

Background

Judicial appointments in India follow the collegium system, where senior judges recommend names and the President appoints them after consulting the Chief Justice of India. Adding temporary judges is a common response to the growing backlog of cases in High Courts.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning

Mains Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how the executive and judiciary share responsibility for High Court appointments and assess whether appointing Additional Judges improves judicial efficiency. (GS‑2)

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Prelims Focus (Appointments & Indices)
  6. President Appoints Three Additional Judges to Andhra Pradesh High Court – 2026
GS252% Exam RelevancePrelims Focus (Appointments & Indices)
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

The President of India, after consulting the Chief Justice of India, has appointed three new Additional Judges to the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The appointments were made under the powers granted by the Constitution of India.

Key Developments

  • Smt. Sunitha Gandham appointed as an Additional Judge.
  • Shri Alapati Giridhar appointed as an Additional Judge.
  • Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi (also known as Ch. Purushottama Kumar (Jagannath Srinivasan)) appointed as an Additional Judge.

Important Facts

  • The appointments were announced on 03 July 2026 by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) in Delhi.
  • All three judges will serve on a temporary basis to help clear the growing case backlog in the High Court.
  • The decision reflects the central government's effort to strengthen the judiciary at the state level.

Exam Relevance

Understanding judicial appointments is crucial for GS‑2 aspirants. The process illustrates the separation of powers, the role of the executive in judicial selections, and the constitutional safeguards that ensure independence of the judiciary. Candidates should note how the President’s powers are exercised in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, a practice established by the collegium system. Moreover, the appointment of Additional Judges highlights the judiciary’s response to case backlogs, a recurring theme in governance and legal reforms.

Way Forward

While the three appointments will provide immediate relief, long‑term solutions require:

  • Increasing the number of permanent judges to match the growing population and case load.
  • Strengthening infrastructure and digitisation of court processes to speed up case disposal.
  • Periodic review of the collegium system to enhance transparency and accountability.

For UPSC preparation, students should track similar appointments across states, compare the use of Additional Judges versus permanent judges, and analyse how these moves affect the efficiency of the Indian judicial system.

Read Original on pib

President appoints three Additional Judges to ease Andhra Pradesh High Court backlog

Key Facts

  1. President appointed three Additional Judges to Andhra Pradesh High Court on 03 July 2026.
  2. The judges are Smt. Sunitha Gandham, Shri Alapati Giridhar and Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi.
  3. Appointments were made after consultation with the Chief Justice of India.
  4. Additional Judges are temporary judges, usually for up to two years, to reduce case backlog.
  5. The power to appoint High Court judges comes from Article 217 of the Constitution; Article 224 deals with Additional Judges.
  6. The appointments were announced by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) in Delhi.
  7. The move reflects the central government's effort to strengthen state‑level judiciary.

Background & Context

Judicial appointments in India follow the collegium system, where senior judges recommend names and the President appoints them after consulting the Chief Justice of India. Adding temporary judges is a common response to the growing backlog of cases in High Courts.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning

Mains Answer Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how the executive and judiciary share responsibility for High Court appointments and assess whether appointing Additional Judges improves judicial efficiency. (GS‑2)

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Judicial appointments

2 marks
3 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Additional Judges

10 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Judicial backlog and reforms

25 marks
4 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

President Appoints Three Additional Judges... | UPSC Current Affairs