Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

President Approves Appointment of Five New Judges to Supreme Court – Details of Appointees

On 1 June 2026, the President of India approved the appointment of five new judges to the Supreme Court under Article 124. The appointees include four Chief Justices from major High Courts and a senior advocate, reflecting the constitutional process for judicial elevation and its relevance to UPSC Polity.
The President of India has signed notifications dated 01 June 2026 appointing five distinguished jurists to the Supreme Court of India . The appointments are made under Article 124 and will take effect when the appointees assume charge. Key Developments Appointment of Justice Sheel Nagu , Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana . Appointment of Justice Shree Chandrashekhar , Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay . Appointment of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva , Chief Justice of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh . Appointment of Justice Arun Palli , Chief Justice of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh . Appointment of Smt. Venkita Subramani Mohana , a Senior Advocate , as a Judge of the Supreme Court. Important Facts The notifications were issued by the President of India in exercise of powers under Article 124 . The appointees are all serving as Chief Justices of their respective High Courts, except for the senior advocate who brings extensive courtroom experience. UPSC Relevance Understanding the judicial appointment process is essential for GS Paper II (Polity) . The Constitution empowers the President to appoint Supreme Court judges on the recommendation of the Collegium (Chief Justice of India and senior judges). The inclusion of a senior advocate highlights the role of legal expertise in the judiciary, a point often asked in questions on judicial reforms and independence. Way Forward New judges will soon take oath and begin hearing cases, influencing jurisprudence on constitutional, civil, and criminal matters. Aspirants should monitor the first major judgments of these judges to gauge shifts in legal interpretation. Additionally, the appointments underscore the need to study the Article 124 framework and recent debates on judicial appointments, which may feature in future UPSC questions.
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. President Approves Appointment of Five New Judges to Supreme Court – Details of Appointees
Must Review
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs268% UPSC Relevance

Full Article

<p>The <strong>President of India</strong> has signed notifications dated <strong>01 June 2026</strong> appointing five distinguished jurists to the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Supreme Court of India — The apex judicial body in India, final interpreter of the Constitution and source of law (GS2: Polity)">Supreme Court of India</span>. The appointments are made under <span class="key-term" data-definition="Article 124 of the Constitution — Provides for the establishment and composition of the Supreme Court and outlines the appointment procedure for its judges (GS2: Polity)">Article 124</span> and will take effect when the appointees assume charge.</p> <h2>Key Developments</h2> <ul> <li>Appointment of <strong>Justice Sheel Nagu</strong>, Chief Justice of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="High Court — The principal civil court of a state or group of states, having jurisdiction over appeals and original matters (GS2: Polity)">High Court of Punjab and Haryana</span>.</li> <li>Appointment of <strong>Justice Shree Chandrashekhar</strong>, Chief Justice of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="High Court — The principal civil court of a state or group of states, having jurisdiction over appeals and original matters (GS2: Polity)">High Court of Bombay</span>.</li> <li>Appointment of <strong>Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva</strong>, Chief Justice of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="High Court — The principal civil court of a state or group of states, having jurisdiction over appeals and original matters (GS2: Polity)">High Court of Madhya Pradesh</span>.</li> <li>Appointment of <strong>Justice Arun Palli</strong>, Chief Justice of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="High Court — The principal civil court of a state or group of states, having jurisdiction over appeals and original matters (GS2: Polity)">High Court of Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh</span>.</li> <li>Appointment of <strong>Smt. Venkita Subramani Mohana</strong>, a <span class="key-term" data-definition="Senior Advocate — A distinguished lawyer designated by the Supreme Court or a High Court, often appointed as a judge for their expertise (GS2: Polity)">Senior Advocate</span>, as a Judge of the Supreme Court.</li> </ul> <h2>Important Facts</h2> <p>The notifications were issued by the <span class="key-term" data-definition="President of India — The constitutional head of state who, on the advice of the Council of Ministers, appoints judges of the Supreme Court (GS2: Polity)">President of India</span> in exercise of powers under <span class="key-term" data-definition="Article 124 of the Constitution — Provides for the establishment and composition of the Supreme Court and outlines the appointment procedure for its judges (GS2: Polity)">Article 124</span>. The appointees are all serving as <span class="key-term" data-definition="Chief Justice (High Court) — The senior‑most judge of a High Court, responsible for administration and often elevated to the Supreme Court (GS2: Polity)">Chief Justices</span> of their respective High Courts, except for the senior advocate who brings extensive courtroom experience.</p> <h2>UPSC Relevance</h2> <p>Understanding the judicial appointment process is essential for <strong>GS Paper II (Polity)</strong>. The Constitution empowers the <span class="key-term" data-definition="President of India — The constitutional head of state who, on the advice of the Council of Ministers, appoints judges of the Supreme Court (GS2: Polity)">President</span> to appoint Supreme Court judges on the recommendation of the <em>Collegium</em> (Chief Justice of India and senior judges). The inclusion of a senior advocate highlights the role of legal expertise in the judiciary, a point often asked in questions on judicial reforms and independence.</p> <h2>Way Forward</h2> <p>New judges will soon take oath and begin hearing cases, influencing jurisprudence on constitutional, civil, and criminal matters. Aspirants should monitor the first major judgments of these judges to gauge shifts in legal interpretation. Additionally, the appointments underscore the need to study the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Article 124 of the Constitution — Provides for the establishment and composition of the Supreme Court and outlines the appointment procedure for its judges (GS2: Polity)">Article 124</span> framework and recent debates on judicial appointments, which may feature in future UPSC questions.</p>
Read Original on pib

President appoints five judges, highlighting Supreme Court appointment process for UPSC.

Key Facts

  1. President of India signed notifications on 01 June 2026 appointing five judges to the Supreme Court.
  2. Appointments are made under Article 124 of the Constitution, which governs Supreme Court composition and appointments.
  3. Four appointees are chief justices of high courts: Punjab & Haryana, Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh.
  4. Smt. Venkita Subramani Mohana, a senior advocate, is appointed as a Supreme Court judge.
  5. These appointments fill five vacancies, restoring the sanctioned strength of 34 Supreme Court judges.
  6. The collegium – Chief Justice of India and senior judges – recommended the names; the President acts on this advice.

Background & Context

The Constitution empowers the President to appoint Supreme Court judges on the collegium's recommendation, ensuring a balance between executive formalities and judicial independence. Understanding this mechanism is essential for GS‑II (Polity) and for analysing reforms aimed at enhancing transparency in judicial appointments.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioningEssay•Philosophy, Ethics and Human Values

Mains Answer Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss the appointment procedure under Article 124, the role of the collegium, and its impact on judicial independence (GS‑II). A possible question could ask you to evaluate the effectiveness of the collegium system.

Analysis

Practice Questions

Prelims
Easy
Prelims MCQ

Constitutional provisions for judicial appointments

1 marks
3 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

Judicial appointments

10 marks
7 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Judicial independence and appointment reforms

250 marks
5 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Quick Reference

Key Insight

President appoints five judges, highlighting Supreme Court appointment process for UPSC.

Key Facts

  1. President of India signed notifications on 01 June 2026 appointing five judges to the Supreme Court.
  2. Appointments are made under Article 124 of the Constitution, which governs Supreme Court composition and appointments.
  3. Four appointees are chief justices of high courts: Punjab & Haryana, Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh.
  4. Smt. Venkita Subramani Mohana, a senior advocate, is appointed as a Supreme Court judge.
  5. These appointments fill five vacancies, restoring the sanctioned strength of 34 Supreme Court judges.
  6. The collegium – Chief Justice of India and senior judges – recommended the names; the President acts on this advice.

Background

The Constitution empowers the President to appoint Supreme Court judges on the collegium's recommendation, ensuring a balance between executive formalities and judicial independence. Understanding this mechanism is essential for GS‑II (Polity) and for analysing reforms aimed at enhancing transparency in judicial appointments.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning
  • Essay — Philosophy, Ethics and Human Values

Mains Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss the appointment procedure under Article 124, the role of the collegium, and its impact on judicial independence (GS‑II). A possible question could ask you to evaluate the effectiveness of the collegium system.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
President Approves Appointment of Five New... | UPSC Current Affairs