Supreme Court’s Sabarimala debate pits religious freedom against gender equality – a UPSC hot‑topic
The Sabarimala reference tests the limits of constitutional interpretation on religious freedom versus gender equality, a key theme in GS‑2 (Polity) and GS‑1 (Societal diversity). It also highlights the historical role of women in framing the Constitution, linking to GS‑1 history and GS‑4 ethics on social justice.
Supreme Court’s Sabarimala debate pits religious freedom against gender equality – a UPSC hot‑topic
The Sabarimala reference tests the limits of constitutional interpretation on religious freedom versus gender equality, a key theme in GS‑2 (Polity) and GS‑1 (Societal diversity). It also highlights the historical role of women in framing the Constitution, linking to GS‑1 history and GS‑4 ethics on social justice.
GS‑2: Analyse the tension between Articles 25, 26 and Articles 14, 15, 17 in the Sabarimala case and evaluate how the judiciary can balance religious liberty with gender justice.
No related PYQs linked to this article yet.
Constitutional provisions – Article 17
Interpretation of Articles 25, 14, 15 in religious‑social contexts
Secularism, gender justice, constitutional interpretation
GS‑2: Analyse the tension between Articles 25, 26 and Articles 14, 15, 17 in the Sabarimala case and evaluate how the judiciary can balance religious liberty with gender justice.