Overview The Supreme Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed by activist Dr Gitanjali Angmo . The petition challenged the preventive detention of her husband Sonam Wangchuk under the NSA . The petition became moot after the Union Government revoked the order on 14 March 2026. Key Developments On 14 March 2026, the Centre withdrew the NSA detention order against Sonam Wangchuk , who had already served roughly half of the maximum 12‑month period. The bench, consisting of Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice P.B. Varale , declared the petition infructuous (i.e., without any remaining issue to decide). Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal sought a hearing on the merits, but the Solicitor General of India , Tushar Mehta , asked the petitioner to withdraw. The Supreme Court disposed of the case without examining the substantive legality of the NSA order. Important Facts The NSA permits preventive detention for up to 12 months without a criminal trial. Preventive detention is a controversial tool, balancing national security against individual liberty. The revocation came after the detainee had completed nearly 6 months of detention. The term infructuous indicates that a petition loses its relevance because the relief sought has already been granted. UPSC Relevance Understanding the interplay between the NSA and fundamental rights is essential for GS‑2 (Polity). The case illustrates: Judicial review of preventive detention orders under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution. The role of the Supreme Court in safeguarding personal liberty. The procedural safeguards (e.g., advisory board, time‑limits) that the Constitution mandates for preventive detention. The significance of the habeas corpus remedy as a check on executive excess. Way Forward While the immediate dispute is resolved, the broader debate on the scope of the NSA remains. Aspirants should monitor: Potential legislative amendments to tighten or relax preventive‑detention provisions. Future Supreme Court judgments that may redefine the balance between security and liberty. Parliamentary debates and reports of the Union Government on the usage of NSA in sensitive regions such as Ladakh. These developments are likely to feature in GS‑2 questions on constitutional safeguards, fundamental rights, and internal security.