Supreme Court Rejects Plea for Additional UPSC Attempt for Covid‑Affected Aspirants The apex Supreme Court dismissed a petition filed by a civil services aspirant seeking a one‑time extra attempt and age relaxation for the Civil Services Examination (2026). The petitioner argued that the pandemic‑induced cancellation of the 2021 exam denied him his last permissible attempt. Key Developments The petition, titled JAIMIN PATEL vs. Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT) & Ors. , sought the constitution of an inter‑ministerial committee to revisit age and attempt relaxations under Article 77(3) of the Constitution. The petitioner requested a stay on the CSE 2026 advertisement until the committee’s report was placed in the public domain. The bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta observed that the petition was filed after a gap of about five years, rendering it belated. The Court declined to entertain the plea, leaving the existing eligibility criteria for CSE 2026 unchanged. Important Facts The pandemic Covid‑19 pandemic led to the cancellation of the 2021 UPSC exam, thereby affecting candidates whose final attempt fell in 2020‑21. Earlier, the Supreme Court in Arijit Shukla v. Union of India (WP(C) 92/2022) had directed a re‑examination of representations by such candidates, but the government allegedly failed to initiate the mandated consultative process. The petitioner also highlighted the role of the UPSC and the DOPT in framing eligibility norms. UPSC Relevance Understanding this judgment is crucial for aspirants because: It clarifies that any change in attempt relaxation or age limits must follow a constitutional consultative process. It underscores the importance of timely legal recourse; delays can render petitions ineffective. It reaffirms the status quo for the 2026 exam, meaning candidates must adhere to the existing age ceiling and maximum number of attempts. Way Forward For candidates and policymakers: Stakeholders should ensure that any future relaxations are processed through the mandated inter‑ministerial committee as per Allocation of Business Rules and related procedural manuals. Aspirants should verify their eligibility against the current norms before applying for CSE 2026. Policy‑makers may consider proactive data‑driven reviews to address pandemic‑related disruptions, avoiding ad‑hoc litigation. In summary, the Supreme Court’s dismissal maintains the existing eligibility framework for the upcoming Civil Services Examination, highlighting procedural rigor and the need for timely action by affected candidates.