The Supreme Court on 15 May 2026 ruled that it will not pass any order in favour of mining lease holders in the Aravalli hills and ranges until it is fully satisfied with the ecological safeguards.
Key Developments
- Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi emphasized a “non‑piecemeal” approach and refused to entertain any lease cancellation without a comprehensive review.
- The court reiterated its February direction to the environment ministry to nominate domain experts for a panel to define the Aravalli hills and ranges.
- Earlier, on 20 November 2025, the court had accepted a uniform definition of the hills and banned fresh mining leases across the four states until expert reports were submitted.
- On 29 December 2025, the court stayed its own November order, citing “critical ambiguities” in the 100‑metre elevation and 500‑metre gap criteria.
Important Facts
The committee’s definition proposes that an Aravalli Hill be any landform in designated districts with an elevation of at least 100 metres above local relief, and an Aravalli Range consist of two or more such hills within 500 metres of each other.
The court also recalled the FSI report of 2010, under which no mining permission shall be granted without prior approval.
Exam Relevance
This case illustrates the interplay of environmental law, federal governance, and judicial review—core topics for GS 3 (Environment) and GS 1 (Polity). Aspirants should note:
- How the judiciary can intervene in policy implementation to safeguard ecological integrity.
- The role of expert committees and the importance of precise statutory definitions in preventing regulatory loopholes.
- The significance of the Aravalli region as a biodiversity hotspot and its impact on sustainable development goals.
Way Forward
The Supreme Court is expected to constitute a panel of independent experts to resolve the ambiguities in the definition. Until the panel submits its report, all mining activities in the Aravalli region remain suspended, and any petition for lease cancellation will be examined on a case‑by‑case basis.