Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Supreme Court ने Justice Dhulia Committee को State Bar Council चुनावों के लिए 10% महिलाओं की को‑ऑप्शन नियम तैयार करने के लिए कहा | GS2 UPSC Current Affairs April 2026
Supreme Court ने Justice Dhulia Committee को State Bar Council चुनावों के लिए 10% महिलाओं की को‑ऑप्शन नियम तैयार करने के लिए कहा
13 अप्रैल 2026 को, Supreme Court ने Justice Dhulia Committee को यह अंतिम रूप देने को कहा कि State Bar Council चुनावों में 30% आरक्षण को पूरा करने के लिए महिलाओं के 10% को‑ऑप्शन को कैसे लागू किया जाएगा। यह कदम प्रक्रियात्मक खामियों को स्पष्ट करने और यह सुनिश्चित करने के लिए है कि को‑ऑप्शन केवल तब ही उपयोग किया जाए जब पर्याप्त महिला निर्वाचित सदस्य न हों, जिससे आरक्षण नीति के उद्देश्य की रक्षा हो।
On 13 April 2026 , the Supreme Court directed the high‑powered supervisory panel headed by Justice (retired) Sudhanshu Dhulia to decide the exact manner of applying a co‑option of women candidates amounting to 10% of the seats reserved under the 30% women reservation rule. मुख्य विकास The bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard a writ petition highlighting possible misuse of the co‑option provision. Three options were tabled by the petitioner: (i) co‑option among the highest‑vote‑receiving women candidates who lost, (ii) delegation of the decision to State Bar Councils or the Bar Council of India (BCI) , and (iii) entrusting the process to the State Election Committee. The Court observed that each option has merits and demerits and therefore tasked the Justice Dhulia committee to consult all stakeholders before finalising the method. The Court clarified that co‑option is a temporary measure for the current election year, not a permanent substitute for genuine electoral competition. Both the petitioner's counsel and an intervenor (a male candidate with the highest votes in Telangana) warned that a blanket co‑option rule could undermine the spirit of the reservation policy. महत्वपूर्ण तथ्य The Advocates Act mandates election of Bar Council members through single transferable vote (STV) .
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Supreme Court ने Justice Dhulia Committee को State Bar Council चुनावों के लिए 10% महिलाओं की को‑ऑप्शन नियम तैयार करने के लिए कहा
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs276% UPSC Relevance

Full Article

<p>On <strong>13 April 2026</strong>, the <span class="key-term" data-definition="India's apex judicial body responsible for interpreting the Constitution and adjudicating disputes involving the Union and states (GS2: Polity)">Supreme Court</span> directed the high‑powered supervisory panel headed by <span class="key-term" data-definition="Retired judge Sudhanshu Dhulia, appointed to oversee the implementation of Bar Council election norms (GS2: Polity)">Justice (retired) Sudhanshu Dhulia</span> to decide the exact manner of applying a <span class="key-term" data-definition="Mechanism allowing a body to appoint additional members to meet reservation requirements when insufficient candidates are elected (GS2: Polity)">co‑option</span> of women candidates amounting to 10% of the seats reserved under the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Mandated quota ensuring that at least 30% of seats in State Bar Council elections are occupied by women, reflecting affirmative action policies (GS2: Polity)">30% women reservation</span> rule.</p> <h3>मुख्य विकास</h3> <ul> <li>The bench comprising <strong>Chief Justice of India Surya Kant</strong> and <strong>Justice Joymalya Bagchi</strong> heard a writ petition highlighting possible misuse of the co‑option provision.</li> <li>Three options were tabled by the petitioner: (i) co‑option among the highest‑vote‑receiving women candidates who lost, (ii) delegation of the decision to State Bar Councils or the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Statutory body that regulates the legal profession, sets standards for legal education, and conducts elections of State Bar Councils (GS2: Polity)">Bar Council of India (BCI)</span>, and (iii) entrusting the process to the State Election Committee.</li> <li>The Court observed that each option has merits and demerits and therefore tasked the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Retired judge Sudhanshu Dhulia, appointed to oversee the implementation of Bar Council election norms (GS2: Polity)">Justice Dhulia committee</span> to consult all stakeholders before finalising the method.</li> <li>The Court clarified that co‑option is a temporary measure for the current election year, not a permanent substitute for genuine electoral competition.</li> <li>Both the petitioner's counsel and an intervenor (a male candidate with the highest votes in Telangana) warned that a blanket co‑option rule could undermine the spirit of the reservation policy.</li> </ul> <h3>महत्वपूर्ण तथ्य</h3> <ul> <li>The <span class="key-term" data-definition="1978 legislation governing the legal profession, including provisions for election of Bar Council members and reservation (GS2: Polity)">Advocates Act</span> mandates election of Bar Council members through <span class="key-term" data-definition="Proportional representation voting system where voters rank candidates and surplus votes are transferred, used for Bar Council elections (GS2: Polity)">single transferable vote (STV)</span>.</li> </ul>
Read Original on livelaw

Analysis

Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT