The apex Supreme Court examined a petition filed by the ED under Article 32 . The petition arose after West Bengal’s Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee allegedly barred the agency’s raids on the Kolkata office of political consultancy I‑PAC in January 2026. Key Developments The bench, led by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra , asked the West Bengal government whether the ED could merely “look and watch” when a chief minister obstructs statutory investigations. West Bengal, represented by senior advocate Shyam Divan , challenged the maintainability of the ED’s writ, arguing that the agency is neither a "body corporate" nor a "legal person" capable of invoking Article 32. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta contended that the CM’s actions hindered a lawful probe into a ₹2,742‑crore coal‑smuggling case, emphasizing the public‑interest nature of the investigation. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal for the CM asserted that the ED does not possess a fundamental right to investigate; its powers stem from the PMLA . The court scheduled the next hearing for 24 March 2026 and hinted at referring the matter to a Constitution Bench. Important Facts • The raids targeted alleged records of the Trinamool Congress, the ruling party in West Bengal, which allegedly were taken by ED officials. • The West Bengal police had earlier stayed the ED’s probe, citing concerns over election‑related data theft. • The petition raises critical questions about the scope of central agencies’ powers versus state autonomy, especially under the federal structure enshrined in the Constitution. UPSC Relevance 1. Centre‑State Relations : The case illustrates tensions between Union agencies and state governments, a recurring theme in GS 2 (Pol