The Supreme Court has set aside a detention order issued under the MPDA Act. The Court held that where ordinary criminal law suffices, and there is no cogent material showing a breach of public order, invoking a preventive detention is unwarranted.
Key Developments
- On 13 October 2025, the appellant was detained under Sections 31(1) and 31(2) of the MPDA Act as a "bootlegger".
- The detention order listed five cases, two under investigation and three pending trial, none of which led to the appellant's arrest.
- The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant’s petition in February 2026; the appeal was taken to the Supreme Court.
- The Court observed that the State had not arrested the appellant and the order lacked any material linking his alleged bootlegging to a disturbance of public order.
- Referencing Arjun v. State of Maharashtra, the bench directed the appellant's immediate release.
Important Facts
The appellant was accused of selling spurious toddy, but no arrest was made in the two recent cases under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. In 2024, a similar detention proposal under the MPDA Act was droppe