The Supreme Court examined whether the benefits of OBC reservation should extend to children whose parents have already moved up the socio‑economic ladder through the same scheme.
Key Developments
- Justice BV Nagarathna asked why children of IAS officers should continue to claim reservation.
- The bench, joined by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, heard a petition challenging a Karnataka High Court order that denied a caste‑validity certificate on "creamy layer" grounds.
- The petitioner, from the Kuruba community (Category II(A) in Karnataka), had been selected as Assistant Engineer (Electrical) in KPTCL under the reserved quota.
- The District Caste and Income Verification Committee found the family income at about ₹19.48 lakh per annum, exceeding the creamy‑layer ceiling, because both parents are state employees earning ₹53,900 and ₹52,650 basic pay respectively.
- Advocate Shashank Ratnoo argued that for government servants, "salary" should not be the sole criterion; instead, the status of the parents (Group A vs. Group B) should decide creamy‑layer eligibility.
Important Facts
- Family income: ₹19.48 lakh per year.
- Parents' designations: both are Group A state employees.
- Current creamy‑layer ceiling for OBCs in Karnataka (2026): ₹8 lakh (as per state policy).
- The petition is recorded as Diary No. 18365/2026 titl