Overview The Supreme Court on 23 March 2026 heard a petition seeking investigation into alleged loan fraud of over ₹40,000 crore by companies of the ADAG . The bench, comprising CJI Surya Kant , Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul Pancholi, directed a swift, transparent inquiry. Key Developments The ED confirmed the constitution of a SIT comprising senior officers, forensic analysts and Bank of Baroda staff. Eight insolvency cases were found to involve debts of roughly ₹2,983 crore settled for a mere ₹26 crore under the alleged Project Help scheme, facilitated by eight NBFCs . The court ordered the CBI to join the probe, noting seven cases under its investigation, including possible involvement of public servants. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta pledged that the investigation would be completed within four weeks , and that four arrests have already been made. All banks and financial institutions were directed to provide full cooperation; any reluctance must be reported to the court. Important Facts • The debt settlement ratio (₹26 crore out of ₹2,983 crore) indicates a 99.1% reduction in claim value, raising concerns of asset undervaluation under the IBC . • The SIT includes an Additional Director, two Deputy Directors, four Assistant Directors/Investigating Officers, forensic analysts, and two Bank of Baroda staff. • The CBI has attached assets worth about ₹15,000 crore and appointed three transaction auditors. UPSC Relevance Understanding this case helps aspirants grasp several core GS topics: Financial Regulation & Insolvency : The misuse of the IBC and the role of NBFCs in corporate distress. Institutional Checks & Balances : The interaction between the Supreme Court , ED , and CBI illustrates judicial oversight of economic offences. Corporate Governance & Fraud : The case highlights how large conglomerates can allegedly manipulate loan structures and insolvency mechanisms, a recurring theme in GS‑3 questions on corporate ethics and financial crimes. Way Forward The court expects the SIT to submit a detailed report within the stipulated four‑week period. Key expectations include: Identification of any collusion between the eight NBFCs , the ADAG companies, and public officials. Recovery of the outstanding debt and possible reversal of the undervalued settlements under the IBC process. Strengthening of regulatory oversight to prevent misuse of insolvency mechanisms, possibly through amendments to the IBC and tighter supervision of NBFCs . For UPSC candidates, monitoring the outcome will provide insights into how India’s legal and financial institutions respond to large‑scale corporate fraud, a critical aspect of governance and economic stability.