Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Supreme Court Reviews ₹24,000‑crore Police Modernisation Mission; ASUMP Funds Urged to Remain Active

The Supreme Court, on 3 September 2026, examined the Union’s ₹24,000‑crore Police Modernisation Mission and urged the Centre to avoid letting existing ASUMP funds lie idle. The Court also highlighted Jharkhand’s stalled CCTV proposal, reinforcing the 2021 mandate for surveillance in police stations.
Overview On 3 September 2026 , the Supreme Court heard the Union government’s response to a suo motu case concerning police‑station surveillance. The Centre said it has started a Police Modernisation Mission to modernise police forces over the next five years. Key Developments The Union has earmarked ₹24,000 crore for the new mission, but detailed components await financial clearance. The ASUMP scheme has been extended to 30 September 2026 to allow states to use remaining funds. The Court asked why existing ASUMP funds should lie dormant while the new scheme is pending. Jharkhand’s request for ₹112.5 crore under ASUMP was rejected; the state has not installed any CCTV cameras since 2020. The Court reminded the Centre of its 2021 judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh , which requires CCTV at key points in police stations and investigative agencies. Important Facts The Additional Solicitor General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare told Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that the new mission will enhance the internal‑security capabilities of both CAPFs and state police through technology. The Centre has not yet clarified whether unspent ASUMP money will automatically flow into the new mission, prompting the Court’s concern about “dormant funds.” UPSC Relevance This case touches on several GS topics: Polity (GS2) : Role of the Supreme Court in policy oversight; functioning of central schemes like ASUMP. Security (GS3) : Modernisation of police forces and the use of surveillance technology to prevent custodial torture. Governance (GS4) : Inter‑governmental coordination between Centre, states, and Union Territories for scheme implementation. Way Forward The Centre is expected to seek further instructions and report back on 21 September 2026 . In the interim, the Court has urged the Union to: Utilise remaining ASUMP funds for immediate CCTV installation. Provide a clear timeline for financial approval of the Police Modernisation Mission . Address the pending Jharkhand proposal and ensure compliance with the 2021 Supreme Court directive. Effective use of these schemes will strengthen India’s internal‑security architecture and demonstrate how judicial oversight can shape policy execution—key points for UPSC aspirants.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Supreme Court pushes Union to activate ASUMP funds amid pending police modernisation plan

Key Facts

  1. 3 Sept 2026: Supreme Court heard the Union’s response to a suo motu case on police‑station surveillance.
  2. The Centre announced a ₹24,000‑crore five‑year Police Modernisation Mission for state police and CAPFs.
  3. ASUMP scheme (Assistance to States and UTs for Modernisation of Police) was extended to 30 Sept 2026.
  4. Jharkhand’s request for ₹112.5 crore under ASUMP was rejected; the state has installed no CCTV since 2020.
  5. 2021 Supreme Court judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh mandates CCTV at key points in police stations.
  6. Additional Solicitor General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare represented the Union before Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta.
  7. The Court directed the Union to report back on the fund‑utilisation plan by 21 Sept 2026.

Background

The issue sits at the intersection of Polity (judicial review of executive schemes) and Internal Security (modernising police with technology). It reflects the federal coordination needed for central schemes like ASUMP and the challenges of translating policy announcements into on‑ground implementation.

UPSC Syllabus

  • GS2 — Statutory, regulatory and quasi-judicial bodies
  • GS2 — Functions and responsibilities of Union and States
  • GS2 — Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functions
  • Prelims_GS — National Current Affairs
  • GS3 — Various security forces and agencies

Mains Angle

In a GS‑2/GS‑3 answer, discuss how judicial intervention can accelerate police‑reform schemes and the importance of effective fund utilisation for internal security. Possible question: "Evaluate the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring implementation of police modernisation initiatives."

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Defence
  5. Supreme Court Reviews ₹24,000‑crore Police Modernisation Mission; ASUMP Funds Urged to Remain Active
GS278% Exam Relevance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

On 3 September 2026, the Supreme Court heard the Union government’s response to a suo motu case concerning police‑station surveillance. The Centre said it has started a Police Modernisation Mission to modernise police forces over the next five years.

Key Developments

  • The Union has earmarked ₹24,000 crore for the new mission, but detailed components await financial clearance.
  • The ASUMP scheme has been extended to 30 September 2026 to allow states to use remaining funds.
  • The Court asked why existing ASUMP funds should lie dormant while the new scheme is pending.
  • Jharkhand’s request for ₹112.5 crore under ASUMP was rejected; the state has not installed any CCTV cameras since 2020.
  • The Court reminded the Centre of its 2021 judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, which requires CCTV at key points in police stations and investigative agencies.

Important Facts

The Additional Solicitor General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare told Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that the new mission will enhance the internal‑security capabilities of both CAPFs and state police through technology.

The Centre has not yet clarified whether unspent ASUMP money will automatically flow into the new mission, prompting the Court’s concern about “dormant funds.”

Exam Relevance

This case touches on several GS topics:

  • Polity (GS2): Role of the Supreme Court in policy oversight; functioning of central schemes like ASUMP.
  • Security (GS3): Modernisation of police forces and the use of surveillance technology to prevent custodial torture.
  • Governance (GS4): Inter‑governmental coordination between Centre, states, and Union Territories for scheme implementation.

Way Forward

The Centre is expected to seek further instructions and report back on 21 September 2026. In the interim, the Court has urged the Union to:

  • Utilise remaining ASUMP funds for immediate CCTV installation.
  • Provide a clear timeline for financial approval of the Police Modernisation Mission.
  • Address the pending Jharkhand proposal and ensure compliance with the 2021 Supreme Court directive.

Effective use of these schemes will strengthen India’s internal‑security architecture and demonstrate how judicial oversight can shape policy execution—key points for UPSC aspirants.

Read Original on hindu

Supreme Court pushes Union to activate ASUMP funds amid pending police modernisation plan

Key Facts

  1. 3 Sept 2026: Supreme Court heard the Union’s response to a suo motu case on police‑station surveillance.
  2. The Centre announced a ₹24,000‑crore five‑year Police Modernisation Mission for state police and CAPFs.
  3. ASUMP scheme (Assistance to States and UTs for Modernisation of Police) was extended to 30 Sept 2026.
  4. Jharkhand’s request for ₹112.5 crore under ASUMP was rejected; the state has installed no CCTV since 2020.
  5. 2021 Supreme Court judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh mandates CCTV at key points in police stations.
  6. Additional Solicitor General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare represented the Union before Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta.
  7. The Court directed the Union to report back on the fund‑utilisation plan by 21 Sept 2026.

Background & Context

The issue sits at the intersection of Polity (judicial review of executive schemes) and Internal Security (modernising police with technology). It reflects the federal coordination needed for central schemes like ASUMP and the challenges of translating policy announcements into on‑ground implementation.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

GS2•Statutory, regulatory and quasi-judicial bodiesGS2•Functions and responsibilities of Union and StatesGS2•Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functionsPrelims_GS•National Current AffairsGS3•Various security forces and agencies

Mains Answer Angle

In a GS‑2/GS‑3 answer, discuss how judicial intervention can accelerate police‑reform schemes and the importance of effective fund utilisation for internal security. Possible question: "Evaluate the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring implementation of police modernisation initiatives."

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

Prelims
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Judicial oversight of executive policies

1 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Police modernisation scheme

5 marks
5 keywords
GS3
Hard
Mains Essay

Funding and implementation of police reforms

20 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Supreme Court Reviews ₹24,000‑crore Police... | UPSC Current Affairs