Supreme Court pushes 30% women lawyers quota, testing gender‑reservation policy
Women dominate law school enrolments but face a steep drop‑off in senior legal appointments. The Supreme Court, using its power under Article 32, is examining whether constitutional guarantees of equality (Art 14), special provisions for women (Art 15(3)), right to practice any profession (Art 19(1)(g)) and right to livelihood (Art 21) justify a 30% reservation in government legal panels, linking the issue to the larger theme of gender‑justice policy in GS‑2.
GS‑2 (Polity) – Discuss the need for gender‑based reservation in professional services, evaluating constitutional provisions, policy implications and potential challenges.
Constitutional provisions for affirmative action
Constitutional law – Equality and affirmative action
Affirmative action and gender justice
Supreme Court pushes 30% women lawyers quota, testing gender‑reservation policy
Women dominate law school enrolments but face a steep drop‑off in senior legal appointments. The Supreme Court, using its power under Article 32, is examining whether constitutional guarantees of equality (Art 14), special provisions for women (Art 15(3)), right to practice any profession (Art 19(1)(g)) and right to livelihood (Art 21) justify a 30% reservation in government legal panels, linking the issue to the larger theme of gender‑justice policy in GS‑2.
GS‑2 (Polity) – Discuss the need for gender‑based reservation in professional services, evaluating constitutional provisions, policy implications and potential challenges.