Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Supreme Court Seeks National Digital Registry for Advocates and Social Media Code (2026)

The Supreme Court, hearing a petition by the Bar Association of India, ordered a review of advocate verification and asked for a National Digital Registry for the Legal Profession of India along with a Social Media and Digital Conduct Code. The move aims to curb fake lawyers, ensure ethical online behaviour, and strengthen young members of the Bar, a matter of relevance to UPSC Polity and Ethics.
Overview The Supreme Court on 18 June 2026 issued notices to the Union Government, the Bar Council of India , State Bar Councils and the University Grants Commission. The notices were in response to a writ petition filed by the Bar Association of India (BAI) seeking a national mechanism to verify advocates and a code of conduct for their social‑media activity. Key Developments The petition proposes the creation of the National Digital Registry for the Legal Profession of India (NDRLP) . The petition also asks the Bar Council of India to frame a Social Media and Digital Conduct Code for advocates. Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the need to protect and train young lawyers, stressing that most advocates are responsible professionals. The Court allowed the petitioner to place a supplementary policy paper outlining a workable model before involving all law universities. The Court hinted at constituting a fresh committee to examine the verification mechanism, noting that earlier delays have led to the current crisis. Important Facts According to the Bar Council of India, 35‑40 % of individuals practising before courts may be fake advocates. The proposed NDRLP would contain a Unique National Advocate Identifier , real‑time enrolment status, disciplinary records and QR‑verifiable public profiles. The existing advocate rolls are fragmented across State Bar Councils, lacking a publicly verifiable national database. The petition also seeks a mandatory pre‑enrolment online course on professional conduct for all new advocates. UPSC Relevance These developments touch upon several UPSC syllabus areas. The role of the Chief Justice of India illustrates the functioning of the judiciary (GS2). The proposal for a national digital registry reflects the government's use of technology for governance and transparency (GS3). The need for a professional code of conduct aligns with ethics and accountability in public life (GS4). Understanding the structure of the Bar Council of India and the Bar Association of India helps in answering questions on legal institutions and regulatory frameworks. Way Forward The Court is likely to direct the Bar Council of India to draft a detailed framework for the NDRLP, possibly after consulting law universities and state bar councils. A phased rollout—starting with a pilot model—may be recommended to avoid delays. Simultaneously, a draft Social Media and Digital Conduct Code will be prepared, focusing on training young lawyers and penalising misuse. Stakeholders, including law schools and bar associations, will be invited to submit suggestions before finalisation.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Supreme Court pushes for a national advocate registry and social‑media code to curb fake lawyers

Key Facts

  1. 18 June 2026: Supreme Court issued notices to Union Government, Bar Council of India, State Bar Councils and UGC.
  2. Bar Association of India petition seeks a National Digital Registry for the Legal Profession (NDRLP) with a Unique National Advocate Identifier.
  3. The petition also asks the Bar Council of India to frame a Social Media and Digital Conduct Code for advocates.
  4. Bar Council data indicates 35‑40% of persons practising before courts may be fake advocates.
  5. NDRLP will contain real‑time enrolment status, disciplinary records and QR‑verifiable public profiles of all lawyers.
  6. A mandatory pre‑enrolment online course on professional conduct for new advocates is proposed.
  7. Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the need to train and protect young lawyers.

Background

The legal profession in India lacks a single, publicly verifiable database, leading to a surge of fake practitioners. The Supreme Court's intervention links judicial oversight with digital governance and professional ethics, core themes of GS‑2 and GS‑3.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Essay — Media, Communication and Information
  • GS4 — Dimensions of ethics - private and public relationships
  • GS2 — Government policies and interventions for development
  • Prelims_GS — National Current Affairs
  • GS4 — Information sharing, transparency, RTI, codes of ethics and conduct
  • Essay — Science, Technology and Society
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning
  • Essay — Democracy, Governance and Public Administration
  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS4 — Integrity, impartiality, non-partisanship, objectivity and dedication to public service

Mains Angle

In a GS‑2 answer, discuss how a national digital registry and a social‑media code can strengthen legal accountability and improve governance. A possible question may ask about reforms needed in the legal profession to ensure transparency and ethical conduct.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Supreme Court Seeks National Digital Registry for Advocates and Social Media Code (2026)
GS270% Exam Relevance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

The Supreme Court on 18 June 2026 issued notices to the Union Government, the Bar Council of India, State Bar Councils and the University Grants Commission. The notices were in response to a writ petition filed by the Bar Association of India (BAI) seeking a national mechanism to verify advocates and a code of conduct for their social‑media activity.

Key Developments

  • The petition proposes the creation of the National Digital Registry for the Legal Profession of India (NDRLP).
  • The petition also asks the Bar Council of India to frame a Social Media and Digital Conduct Code for advocates.
  • Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the need to protect and train young lawyers, stressing that most advocates are responsible professionals.
  • The Court allowed the petitioner to place a supplementary policy paper outlining a workable model before involving all law universities.
  • The Court hinted at constituting a fresh committee to examine the verification mechanism, noting that earlier delays have led to the current crisis.

Important Facts

  • According to the Bar Council of India, 35‑40 % of individuals practising before courts may be fake advocates.
  • The proposed NDRLP would contain a Unique National Advocate Identifier, real‑time enrolment status, disciplinary records and QR‑verifiable public profiles.
  • The existing advocate rolls are fragmented across State Bar Councils, lacking a publicly verifiable national database.
  • The petition also seeks a mandatory pre‑enrolment online course on professional conduct for all new advocates.

Exam Relevance

These developments touch upon several UPSC syllabus areas. The role of the Chief Justice of India illustrates the functioning of the judiciary (GS2). The proposal for a national digital registry reflects the government's use of technology for governance and transparency (GS3). The need for a professional code of conduct aligns with ethics and accountability in public life (GS4). Understanding the structure of the Bar Council of India and the Bar Association of India helps in answering questions on legal institutions and regulatory frameworks.

Way Forward

The Court is likely to direct the Bar Council of India to draft a detailed framework for the NDRLP, possibly after consulting law universities and state bar councils. A phased rollout—starting with a pilot model—may be recommended to avoid delays. Simultaneously, a draft Social Media and Digital Conduct Code will be prepared, focusing on training young lawyers and penalising misuse. Stakeholders, including law schools and bar associations, will be invited to submit suggestions before finalisation.

Read Original on livelaw

Supreme Court pushes for a national advocate registry and social‑media code to curb fake lawyers

Key Facts

  1. 18 June 2026: Supreme Court issued notices to Union Government, Bar Council of India, State Bar Councils and UGC.
  2. Bar Association of India petition seeks a National Digital Registry for the Legal Profession (NDRLP) with a Unique National Advocate Identifier.
  3. The petition also asks the Bar Council of India to frame a Social Media and Digital Conduct Code for advocates.
  4. Bar Council data indicates 35‑40% of persons practising before courts may be fake advocates.
  5. NDRLP will contain real‑time enrolment status, disciplinary records and QR‑verifiable public profiles of all lawyers.
  6. A mandatory pre‑enrolment online course on professional conduct for new advocates is proposed.
  7. Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the need to train and protect young lawyers.

Background & Context

The legal profession in India lacks a single, publicly verifiable database, leading to a surge of fake practitioners. The Supreme Court's intervention links judicial oversight with digital governance and professional ethics, core themes of GS‑2 and GS‑3.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Essay•Media, Communication and InformationGS4•Dimensions of ethics - private and public relationshipsGS2•Government policies and interventions for developmentPrelims_GS•National Current AffairsGS4•Information sharing, transparency, RTI, codes of ethics and conductEssay•Science, Technology and SocietyGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioningEssay•Democracy, Governance and Public AdministrationPrelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS4•Integrity, impartiality, non-partisanship, objectivity and dedication to public service

Mains Answer Angle

In a GS‑2 answer, discuss how a national digital registry and a social‑media code can strengthen legal accountability and improve governance. A possible question may ask about reforms needed in the legal profession to ensure transparency and ethical conduct.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS1
Easy
Prelims MCQ

Fake lawyer problem

1 marks
3 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

National Advocate Registry

5 marks
5 keywords
GS4
Hard
Mains Essay

Social media conduct for legal professionals

20 marks
5 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Supreme Court Seeks National Digital Regis... | UPSC Current Affairs