US Congressman Flags India's 2026 FCRA Amendment as Threat to Churches — Bilateral Implications

Overview On 4 August 2026 , U.S. Congressman Riley Moore expressed concern over India’s proposed changes to the FCRA . He warned that the amendment could allow the government to take over churches and religious charities, potentially straining India‑U.S. ties. Key Developments The Bill seeks to create a Designated Authority for such assets. If an organisation’s registration is cancelled, the Authority must ensure that any place of worship retains its religious character. The maximum imprisonment for FCRA violations is reduced from five years to one year. Data from the Ministry of Home Affairs shows 13,520 entities received ₹55,741 crore in foreign contributions between 2019‑2022. As of 15 July 2026, the FCRA portal lists 14,449 active , 22,498 cancelled , and 15,212 expired certificates. Important Facts The amendment aims to tighten oversight of foreign money, citing concerns over misuse. However, critics argue it could be used to curb the activities of minority religious groups, especially Christians, who have a long presence in India since the apostle St Thomas. UPSC Relevance Understanding the balance between national security and religious freedom is essential for GS2: Polity questions on secularism and minority rights. The amendment illustrates how legislation can affect India‑U.S. diplomatic relations , a topic in GS1: International Relations . Data on foreign contributions helps answer questions on NGO regulation and financial transparency in GS3: Economy . Way Forward Stakeholders, including religious bodies and civil society, may seek judicial review to ensure the amendment does not violate constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion. The government could consider clearer safeguards that protect religious character while preventing fund misuse. Monitoring reactions from the United States will be crucial for maintaining strategic partnership.