Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

The Crisis of Multilateralism: Trumpism and the Fragmentation of Gl… | Vaidra
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Editorials
  4. The Crisis of Multilateralism: Trumpism and the Fragmentation of Global Trade
All Editorials

The Crisis of Multilateralism: Trumpism and the Fragmentation of Global Trade

hindu
economy
25 February 2026
5 min read
Read original article

Summary

The evolution of international trade agreements is currently at a crossroads, moving away from the rules-based multilateralism of the World Trade Organization (WTO) toward a more transactional, bilateral approach often associated with 'Trumpian' trade policy. Historically, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the WTO provided a predictable framework based on the 'Most Favored Nati

Full Analysis

The evolution of international trade agreements is currently at a crossroads, moving away from the rules-based multilateralism of the World Trade Organization (WTO) toward a more transactional, bilateral approach often associated with 'Trumpian' trade policy. Historically, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the WTO provided a predictable framework based on the 'Most Favored Nation' (MFN) principle. However, recent trends show a preference for sector-specific deals and 'plurilateral' agreements that often bypass the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism. This 'legal suspicion' arises because many of these new-age deals do not meet the stringent requirements of GATT Article XXIV, which allows for regional trade agreements only if they cover 'substantially all trade.' The analysis indicates that this shift leads to a fragmented global economy where trade is used as a tool for geopolitical leverage rather than mutual economic efficiency. For India, this presents a dual challenge: it must protect its interests at the WTO while simultaneously engaging in 'Early Harvest' deals and Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs) with key partners like the UAE and Australia to stay competitive. The erosion of the WTO's authority could lead to increased protectionism and trade wars, which would be detrimental to developing economies that rely on stable global markets.

Key Takeaways

  • The shift from multilateralism to bilateralism undermines the authority and predictability of the WTO.
  • Transaction-based trade deals often prioritize immediate political gains over long-term international legal norms.
  • The 'Most Favored Nation' (MFN) principle is being increasingly sidelined by discriminatory trade preferences.
  • Developing nations like India must navigate this fragmentation by balancing domestic protection with strategic trade openness.

UPSC Angle

Crucial for understanding the changing nature of globalization, the challenges to the rule-based international order, and India's trade policy strategy.

Prelims Facts

  • GATT Article XXIV provides the legal framework for the formation of Customs Unions and Free Trade Areas.
  • The Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle ensures that a trade advantage granted to one member is extended to all WTO members.
  • The WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) is currently facing a crisis due to the non-appointment of members to its Appellate Body.
  • India is a founding member of both GATT and the WTO.

Mains Relevance

GS Paper 2: Important International institutions, agencies and fora - their structure, mandate; Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India's interests.

View source article: The evolving nature of trade agreements

Related Content

Related Articles

  • →The evolving nature of trade agreements