Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

जजेज़ इन्क्वायरी कमेटी ने जस्टिस यशवंत वर्मा को दोषी पाया; एससी ने एसआईटी जांच को खारिज किया

जजेज़ इन्क्वायरी एक्ट के तहत एक तीन‑सदस्यीय पैनल, जिसका नेतृत्व Supreme Court Justice Aravind Kumar ने किया, ने Justice Yashwant Varma के खिलाफ सभी आरोपों को सिद्ध पाया, जिससे उनका इस्तीफा और संसद में चल रही इम्पीचमेंट प्रक्रिया शुरू हुई। Supreme Court ने Special Investigation Team की जांच के लिए दायर याचिका को खारिज क…
Overview The three‑member Judges Inquiry Act panel, headed by Supreme Court Justice Aravind Kumar , concluded that all charges against Justice Yashwant Varma are proved. The panel’s report was placed in both Houses of Parliament and sent for further legal action. Key Developments May 2025: Panel submitted its findings to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla . March 14, 2025: A fire at Justice Varma’s official residence revealed a large cache of burnt cash in a storeroom. July 2025: Over 200 MPs moved a motion to impeach the judge. August 2025: The panel was constituted by Speaker Birla. August 2026: The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking a SIT probe into the matter. Important Facts The in‑house committee set up by former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna found that Justice Varma had "active or tacit control" over the storeroom where the cash was hidden. Following the controversy, Varma resigned from the Delhi High Court and was repatriated to his parent bench, the Allahabad High Court . His resignation has not yet been formally notified by the Law Ministry, as the President’s acceptance is required for official notification. UPSC Relevance This case illustrates several constitutional and administrative concepts that are frequently asked in GS‑2 (Polity): Impeachment of judges and the role of Parliament in judicial accountability. The procedure for a judge’s resignation, which becomes effective once the President formally accepts it, highlighting the interplay between the executive and the judiciary. The functioning of a <span class="key-term" data-definition="Special Investigation Team (SIT) — a team appointed to investigate high‑profile cases, often when regular police investigations are
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Judicial misconduct probe triggers impeachment debate, highlighting removal mechanisms for judges

Key Facts

  1. Judges Inquiry Act पैनल, जिसका अध्यक्ष SC Justice Aravind Kumar है, ने Justice Yashwant Varma के खिलाफ सभी आरोप सिद्ध पाए (रिपोर्ट अगस्त 2026 में)।
  2. 14 March 2025 को Varma के निवास में हुई आग ने जले हुए नकदी वाले स्टोरेज रूम का पता लगाया।
  3. पैनल के निष्कर्षों के बाद जुलाई 2025 में 200 से अधिक MPs ने Impeachment प्रस्ताव पेश किया।
  4. Varma ने Delhi High Court से इस्तीफा दिया और Allahabad High Court में वापस भेजा गया; उनका इस्तीफा राष्ट्रपति द्वारा औपचारिक स्वीकृति की प्रतीक्षा में है।
  5. Supreme Court ने अगस्त 2026 में Special Investigation Team (SIT) जांच की याचिका को खारिज कर दिया।
  6. पूर्व CJI Sanjiv Khanna द्वारा स्थापित इन‑हाउस कमेटी ने निष्कर्ष निकाला कि Varma के पास नकदी‑रखने वाले स्टोरेज रूम पर “सक्रिय या मौन नियंत्रण” था।
  7. पैनल की रिपोर्ट मई 2025 में दोनों Lok Sabha और Rajya Sabha में रखी गई और कानूनी कार्रवाई के लिए अग्रेषित की गई।

Background

The episode tests the constitutional provisions for judicial accountability, including impeachment of judges, the role of the Judges Inquiry Act, and the interplay between Parliament, the executive and the courts. It also shows how the Supreme Court can limit investigative agencies like SITs, reflecting the separation of powers taught in GS‑2.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privileges
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning
  • GS4 — Ethics in public administration, ethical concerns and dilemmas
  • Essay — Philosophy, Ethics and Human Values

Mains Angle

GS‑2 (Polity) – candidates can discuss the impeachment process, the statutory framework of the Judges Inquiry Act, and the balance of power among the three branches of government.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. जजेज़ इन्क्वायरी कमेटी ने जस्टिस यशवंत वर्मा को दोषी पाया; एससी ने एसआईटी जांच को खारिज किया
GS270% Exam Relevance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

The three‑member Judges Inquiry Act panel, headed by Supreme Court Justice Aravind Kumar, concluded that all charges against Justice Yashwant Varma are proved. The panel’s report was placed in both Houses of Parliament and sent for further legal action.

Key Developments

  • May 2025: Panel submitted its findings to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.
  • March 14, 2025: A fire at Justice Varma’s official residence revealed a large cache of burnt cash in a storeroom.
  • July 2025: Over 200 MPs moved a motion to impeach the judge.
  • August 2025: The panel was constituted by Speaker Birla.
  • August 2026: The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking a SIT probe into the matter.

Important Facts

The in‑house committee set up by former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna found that Justice Varma had "active or tacit control" over the storeroom where the cash was hidden. Following the controversy, Varma resigned from the Delhi High Court and was repatriated to his parent bench, the Allahabad High Court. His resignation has not yet been formally notified by the Law Ministry, as the President’s acceptance is required for official notification.

Exam Relevance

This case illustrates several constitutional and administrative concepts that are frequently asked in GS‑2 (Polity):

  • Impeachment of judges and the role of Parliament in judicial accountability.
  • The procedure for a judge’s resignation, which becomes effective once the President formally accepts it, highlighting the interplay between the executive and the judiciary.
  • The functioning of a
Read Original on hindu

Judicial misconduct probe triggers impeachment debate, highlighting removal mechanisms for judges

Key Facts

  1. Judges Inquiry Act पैनल, जिसका अध्यक्ष SC Justice Aravind Kumar है, ने Justice Yashwant Varma के खिलाफ सभी आरोप सिद्ध पाए (रिपोर्ट अगस्त 2026 में)।
  2. 14 March 2025 को Varma के निवास में हुई आग ने जले हुए नकदी वाले स्टोरेज रूम का पता लगाया।
  3. पैनल के निष्कर्षों के बाद जुलाई 2025 में 200 से अधिक MPs ने Impeachment प्रस्ताव पेश किया।
  4. Varma ने Delhi High Court से इस्तीफा दिया और Allahabad High Court में वापस भेजा गया; उनका इस्तीफा राष्ट्रपति द्वारा औपचारिक स्वीकृति की प्रतीक्षा में है।
  5. Supreme Court ने अगस्त 2026 में Special Investigation Team (SIT) जांच की याचिका को खारिज कर दिया।
  6. पूर्व CJI Sanjiv Khanna द्वारा स्थापित इन‑हाउस कमेटी ने निष्कर्ष निकाला कि Varma के पास नकदी‑रखने वाले स्टोरेज रूम पर “सक्रिय या मौन नियंत्रण” था।
  7. पैनल की रिपोर्ट मई 2025 में दोनों Lok Sabha और Rajya Sabha में रखी गई और कानूनी कार्रवाई के लिए अग्रेषित की गई।

Background & Context

The episode tests the constitutional provisions for judicial accountability, including impeachment of judges, the role of the Judges Inquiry Act, and the interplay between Parliament, the executive and the courts. It also shows how the Supreme Court can limit investigative agencies like SITs, reflecting the separation of powers taught in GS‑2.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privilegesGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioningGS4•Ethics in public administration, ethical concerns and dilemmasEssay•Philosophy, Ethics and Human Values

Mains Answer Angle

GS‑2 (Polity) – candidates can discuss the impeachment process, the statutory framework of the Judges Inquiry Act, and the balance of power among the three branches of government.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Impeachment of judges

1 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Judges Inquiry Act

5 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Judicial accountability and separation of powers

20 marks
5 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

जजेज़ इन्क्वायरी कमेटी ने जस्टिस यशवंत वर्... | UPSC Current Affairs