Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Delhi High Court ने Rana Ayyub के X पोस्टों पर कार्रवाई का आदेश दिया, जो हिंदू देवताओं को अपमानित करने का आरोप है

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday called for action on posts made by journalist Rana Ayyub on 'X' (formerly Twitter) platform allegedly insulting Hindu deities and spreading anti-India sentiment. The Court said that the matter requires urgent consideration and asked the Delhi Police to transmit the documents to X Corp. 4 (Ayyub) pursuant to which even an FIR is directed to be registered against (Ayyub) on the directions of the court of competent jurisdiction,” the Court said.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday called for action on posts made by journalist Rana Ayyub on 'X' (formerly Twitter) platform allegedly insulting Hindu deities and spreading anti-India sentiment. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav was hearing a plea filed by Amita Sachdeva seeking deletion of the tweets alleging that they are derogatory, inflammatory and communally sensitive. While issuing notice on the plea, the Court asked the Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police and Ayyub to file responses by tomorrow. The Court said that the matter requires urgent consideration and asked the Delhi Police to transmit the documents to X Corp. “Action is necessary in view of the highly derogatory, inflammatory and communal tweets by respondent no. 4 (Ayyub) pursuant to which even an FIR is directed to be registered against (Ayyub) on the directions of the court of competent jurisdiction,” the Court said. The matter is now listed on Friday.Sachdeva has alleged that Ayyub, through her tweets, has not only insulted Hindu deities but also defamed Veer Savarkar and Indian Army. The tweets, total 6 in question, date back to 2013 to 2017. For context, Sachdeva, who claims to be a devout follower of Sanatan Dharma, had filed a complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal requesting criminal action against Ayyub for the social media posts.Later, an FIR was ordered against Ayyub after the trial court observed that "prima-facie" cognizable offences were made out against her punishable under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups), 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class) and 505 (statements conducing public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.In his fresh petition before the High Court, Sachdeva has now sought deletion of the X posts saying that the same have prima facie disclosed the offences in question.As per the petition, Sachdeva had approached X Corp's Grievance Appellate Committee which declined to grant relief on the ground that the matter was sub judice.”Despite the complete exhaustion of the remedies available under Rules 3(2) and 3A of the IT Rules, 2021, of the IT Intermediary Guidelines, the offending tweets continue to remain publicly accessible worldwide as on date. The continued availability of the impugned content is causing ongoing injury to religious sentiments, disturbing communal harmony, and rendering the judicial directions ineffective,” the plea said.In May last year, the Delhi Police had told the trial court that details of Ayyub's X account and the alleged tweets in question were awaited and that the posts are not available on the social media platform.Sachdeva alleged that Ayyub has consistently used her social media to insult Hindu Deities, malign the fabric of Indian unity and promote hostility toward India and its citizens including Indian Army. It was Sachdeva's case that despite follow ups, no action was taken on her complaint. Accordingly, she filed an application under Section 156(3) of CrPC seeking registration of FIR against the journalist.Title: AMITA SACHDEVA v. UOI & Ors
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Delhi HC’s आदेश Rana Ayyub के X पोस्ट्स पर ऑनलाइन घृणा भाषण पर न्यायपालिका की जाँच को उजागर करता है

Key Facts

  1. 8 April 2026: Delhi High Court ने Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police और पत्रकार Rana Ayyub को जवाब देने का निर्देश दिया।
  2. 2013‑2017 के बीच की छह X पोस्ट्स, जिनमें हिंदू देवताओं का अपमान, वीर सावरकर और भारतीय सेना को बदनाम करने का आरोप है।
  3. याचिकाकर्ता Amita Sachdeva (स्वयं घोषित सनातन धर्म अनुयायी) ने IPC धारा 153A, 295A, 505 और CrPC धारा 156(3) का हवाला दिया।
  4. मामले में IT Rules 2021 (Rules 3(2) एवं 3A) का भी उल्लेख है – मध्यस्थों की नोटिस‑एंड‑टेक जिम्मेदारी।
  5. X Corp की Grievance Appellate Committee ने हटाने के अनुरोध को अस्वीकार कर कहा कि मामला sub judice है।
  6. राष्ट्रीय साइबर अपराध रिपोर्टिंग पोर्टल पर शिकायत को प्रारम्भिक रूप से विश्वसनीय पाया जाने के बाद एक FIR दर्ज की गई।
  7. Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police और Rana Ayyub को नोटिस जारी किया गया; उत्तर एक दिन के भीतर मांगे गए।

Background

यह आदेश आपराधिक कानून (IPC घृणा‑भाषण प्रावधान), आईटी अधिनियम के तहत डिजिटल मध्यस्थ उत्तरदायित्व, और संवैधानिक अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता के संगम पर स्थित है। यह दर्शाता है कि न्यायपालिका कैसे हस्तक्षेप कर ऑनलाइन सामग्री को नियंत्रित कर सकती है जो सामुदायिक सौहार्द को खतरे में डालती है, जो GS‑2 और GS‑4 में बार‑बार आने वाला विषय है।

UPSC Syllabus

  • Essay — Media, Communication and Information
  • GS4 — Information sharing, transparency, RTI, codes of ethics and conduct

Mains Angle

GS‑2: सामाजिक मीडिया पर घृणा भाषण को नियमन करने की चुनौतियों पर चर्चा करें जबकि अनुच्छेद 19(1)(a) की स्वतंत्रताओं की रक्षा करें। GS‑4: सार्वजनिक व्यवस्था के साथ अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता को संतुलित करने में मध्यस्थ दिशानिर्देशों (IT Rules 2021) की भूमिका का मूल्यांकन करें।

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Delhi High Court ने Rana Ayyub के X पोस्टों पर कार्रवाई का आदेश दिया, जो हिंदू देवताओं को अपमानित करने का आरोप है
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs262% UPSC Relevance

Full Article

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday called for action on posts made by journalist Rana Ayyub on 'X' (formerly Twitter) platform allegedly insulting Hindu deities and spreading anti-India sentiment. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav was hearing a plea filed by Amita Sachdeva seeking deletion of the tweets alleging that they are derogatory, inflammatory and communally sensitive. While issuing notice on the plea, the Court asked the Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police and Ayyub to file responses by tomorrow. The Court said that the matter requires urgent consideration and asked the Delhi Police to transmit the documents to X Corp. “Action is necessary in view of the highly derogatory, inflammatory and communal tweets by respondent no. 4 (Ayyub) pursuant to which even an FIR is directed to be registered against (Ayyub) on the directions of the court of competent jurisdiction,” the Court said. The matter is now listed on Friday.Sachdeva has alleged that Ayyub, through her tweets, has not only insulted Hindu deities but also defamed Veer Savarkar and Indian Army. The tweets, total 6 in question, date back to 2013 to 2017. For context, Sachdeva, who claims to be a devout follower of Sanatan Dharma, had filed a complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal requesting criminal action against Ayyub for the social media posts.Later, an FIR was ordered against Ayyub after the trial court observed that "prima-facie" cognizable offences were made out against her punishable under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups), 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class) and 505 (statements conducing public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.In his fresh petition before the High Court, Sachdeva has now sought deletion of the X posts saying that the same have prima facie disclosed the offences in question.As per the petition, Sachdeva had approached X Corp's Grievance Appellate Committee which declined to grant relief on the ground that the matter was sub judice.”Despite the complete exhaustion of the remedies available under Rules 3(2) and 3A of the IT Rules, 2021, of the IT Intermediary Guidelines, the offending tweets continue to remain publicly accessible worldwide as on date. The continued availability of the impugned content is causing ongoing injury to religious sentiments, disturbing communal harmony, and rendering the judicial directions ineffective,” the plea said.In May last year, the Delhi Police had told the trial court that details of Ayyub's X account and the alleged tweets in question were awaited and that the posts are not available on the social media platform.Sachdeva alleged that Ayyub has consistently used her social media to insult Hindu Deities, malign the fabric of Indian unity and promote hostility toward India and its citizens including Indian Army. It was Sachdeva's case that despite follow ups, no action was taken on her complaint. Accordingly, she filed an application under Section 156(3) of CrPC seeking registration of FIR against the journalist.Title: AMITA SACHDEVA v. UOI & Ors
Read Original on livelaw

Delhi HC’s आदेश Rana Ayyub के X पोस्ट्स पर ऑनलाइन घृणा भाषण पर न्यायपालिका की जाँच को उजागर करता है

Key Facts

  1. 8 April 2026: Delhi High Court ने Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police और पत्रकार Rana Ayyub को जवाब देने का निर्देश दिया।
  2. 2013‑2017 के बीच की छह X पोस्ट्स, जिनमें हिंदू देवताओं का अपमान, वीर सावरकर और भारतीय सेना को बदनाम करने का आरोप है।
  3. याचिकाकर्ता Amita Sachdeva (स्वयं घोषित सनातन धर्म अनुयायी) ने IPC धारा 153A, 295A, 505 और CrPC धारा 156(3) का हवाला दिया।
  4. मामले में IT Rules 2021 (Rules 3(2) एवं 3A) का भी उल्लेख है – मध्यस्थों की नोटिस‑एंड‑टेक जिम्मेदारी।
  5. X Corp की Grievance Appellate Committee ने हटाने के अनुरोध को अस्वीकार कर कहा कि मामला sub judice है।
  6. राष्ट्रीय साइबर अपराध रिपोर्टिंग पोर्टल पर शिकायत को प्रारम्भिक रूप से विश्वसनीय पाया जाने के बाद एक FIR दर्ज की गई।
  7. Union of India, X Corp, Delhi Police और Rana Ayyub को नोटिस जारी किया गया; उत्तर एक दिन के भीतर मांगे गए।

Background & Context

यह आदेश आपराधिक कानून (IPC घृणा‑भाषण प्रावधान), आईटी अधिनियम के तहत डिजिटल मध्यस्थ उत्तरदायित्व, और संवैधानिक अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता के संगम पर स्थित है। यह दर्शाता है कि न्यायपालिका कैसे हस्तक्षेप कर ऑनलाइन सामग्री को नियंत्रित कर सकती है जो सामुदायिक सौहार्द को खतरे में डालती है, जो GS‑2 और GS‑4 में बार‑बार आने वाला विषय है।

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Essay•Media, Communication and InformationGS4•Information sharing, transparency, RTI, codes of ethics and conduct

Mains Answer Angle

GS‑2: सामाजिक मीडिया पर घृणा भाषण को नियमन करने की चुनौतियों पर चर्चा करें जबकि अनुच्छेद 19(1)(a) की स्वतंत्रताओं की रक्षा करें। GS‑4: सार्वजनिक व्यवस्था के साथ अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता को संतुलित करने में मध्यस्थ दिशानिर्देशों (IT Rules 2021) की भूमिका का मूल्यांकन करें।

Analysis

Practice Questions

GS1
Easy
Prelims MCQ

घृणा भाषण और सामुदायिक अपराध

1 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

मध्यस्थ उत्तरदायित्व और डिजिटल शासन

10 marks
6 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

डिजिटल युग में अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता बनाम सार्वजनिक व्यवस्था

250 marks
8 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Delhi High Court ने Rana Ayyub के X पोस्टो... | UPSC Current Affairs

Related Topics

  • 📚Subject TopicIT Rules, 2021: Due Diligence for Significant Intermediaries
  • 📰Current AffairsAllahabad High Court Declares Claiming a 'Only True Religion' Violates Secularism and Invokes Section 295A IPC
  • 📰Current AffairsAllahabad High Court ने "Only True Religion" का दावा करने को Secularism के विरुद्ध घोषित किया और Section 295A IPC को लागू किया