ED Attaches ₹10.24 Cr in HPZ Token Scam; Uncovers Mule Accounts, Shell Firms and Payment Aggregator Abuse — UPSC Current Affairs | March 17, 2026
ED Attaches ₹10.24 Cr in HPZ Token Scam; Uncovers Mule Accounts, Shell Firms and Payment Aggregator Abuse
The Enforcement Directorate has provisionally attached ₹10.24 crore in 94 accounts linked to the HPZ Token investment scam, uncovering a network of mule accounts, shell companies and misuse of payment aggregators. The case highlights the challenges of regulating digital payments and money‑laundering, a key topic for UPSC aspirants in GS‑3 and GS‑2.
Overview The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached about ₹10.24 crore spread across 94 bank accounts linked to the HPZ Token scam. The investigation revealed a sophisticated network involving mule accounts , shell companies , and the misuse of payment aggregator services such as PayU, Aggrepay and Easebuzz. Key Developments ED attached ₹10.24 crore in 94 accounts as a provisional measure. Investigation traced fund flow from investors to the main accused, Bhupesh Arora , his father Gulshan Arora and associates. Initial collections were made through multiple UPI IDs linked to mule accounts at a private bank. Subsequent transfers were routed to various shell companies that misused payment aggregators for layering. A small portion of the money was cycled back to investors to create a false sense of legitimacy and attract fresh capital. Total proceeds of the alleged crime are estimated at ₹2,200 crore , with more than ₹662 crore already attached. Important Facts The scam leveraged digital payment infrastructure to move large sums quickly, exploiting the anonymity of mule accounts and the low‑friction nature of UPI . By channeling funds through shell companies and misrepresenting transactions on payment aggregators , the perpetrators attempted to ‘layer’ the Proceeds of Crime and make detection harder. UPSC Relevance This case illustrates the challenges of regulating digital finance, a topic frequently asked in GS‑3 (Economy) and GS‑2 (Polity) . Understanding the role of the ED , the mechanics of money‑laundering (placement, layering, integration), and the regulatory gaps in payment aggregators can help aspirants answer questions on financial crimes, cyber‑security, and the need for robust fintech governance. Way Forward Strengthen oversight of payment aggregators through mandatory KYC and transaction monitoring. Introduce real‑time tracking of large‑value transfers on UPI to flag suspicious patterns. Enhance inter‑agency coordination between the ED , the Financial Intelligence Unit and the Reserve Bank of India for quicker attachment of illicit assets. Promote public awareness about investment scams, emphasizing that unusually high returns often signal fraud.
ED provisionally attached ₹10.24 crore in 94 bank accounts linked to the HPZ Token scam (Mar 2026).
Total proceeds of the HPZ Token fraud are estimated at ₹2,200 crore; ₹662 crore have already been attached.
Primary accused are Bhupesh Arora and his father Gulshan Arora, who orchestrated the scheme.
Funds were initially collected via UPI‑linked mule accounts at a private bank and later routed through shell companies using payment aggregators PayU, Aggrepay and Easebuzz.
Money‑laundering stages observed: placement through UPI, layering via shell firms and aggregators, and integration by returning a small portion to investors to create a façade of legitimacy.
Payment aggregators currently operate with limited KYC and transaction‑monitoring mandates under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007.
ED functions under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) and reports to the Ministry of Finance.
Background & Context
The case highlights how digital payment infrastructure can be weaponised for large‑scale money‑laundering, exposing regulatory gaps in fintech oversight. It underscores the ED’s role under PMLA in curbing financial crimes, a key focus in GS‑2 (Statutory bodies) and GS‑3 (Economy).
UPSC Syllabus Connections
GS2•Statutory, regulatory and quasi-judicial bodies
Mains Answer Angle
In a GS‑2 answer, discuss the need for a robust regulatory framework for payment aggregators and fintech platforms to prevent financial frauds, citing the HPZ Token scam as a contemporary example.