Overview The seventh day of the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran saw President Donald Trump demand an unconditional surrender of Tehran, prompting the IRGC to declare full readiness for a prolonged war. The episode underscores the IRGC’s dominance over Iran’s security architecture and its leadership of the regional Axis of Resistance . Key Developments (Bullet Points) Trump’s social‑media post (6 Mar) demanded “unconditional surrender” of Iran. The IRGC issued a statement confirming preparedness for a “prolonged war”. Ali Larijani and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reaffirmed the Guard’s loyalty. IRGC’s overseas arm, the Quds Force , continues to back Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis and other Shia militias. Strategic assets such as the Strait of Hormuz remain under IRGC naval patrol. Important Facts The IRGC, also called Sepah‑e‑Pasdaran , was founded by Ayatollah Khomeini to ensure loyalty of the armed forces to the theocratic system. It now commands roughly 190,000 personnel, about half the size of Iran’s regular army ( Artesh ). The Guard operates three parallel structures: a conventional army, an Basij network, and the Quds Force for external operations. Historically, the IRGC gained prominence during the 1980‑88 Iran‑Iraq war, later shaping regional conflicts: supporting Shia militias in Iraq (2003‑2011), backing President Bashar al‑Assad in Syria (2011‑2024), and fostering Hezbollah in Lebanon (since 1982). The fall of the Assad regime in December 2024 and Israel’s 2025 strikes on Iranian targets have intensified the Guard’s confrontational stance. UPSC Relevance Understanding the IRGC is essential for GS 2 (Polity & International Relations) as it illustrates how a quasi‑military institution can influence a nation’s foreign policy, proxy warfare, and internal security. The Guard’s control over strategic chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz links to GS 3 (Economy) through global oil‑price dynamics. Its ideological roots and constitutional status are pertinent to GS 1 (History) and GS 4 (Ethics) when analysing state‑religion nexus and the use of non‑state actors in statecraft. Way Forward For policymakers, the challenge lies in balancing diplomatic pressure on Tehran with the risk of escalating a broader regional war. Strengthening maritime security in the Gulf, enhancing intelligence on IRGC proxy networks, and engaging regional partners to contain the Axis of Resistance are critical steps. Aspirants should monitor how the IRGC’s dual domestic‑foreign role shapes Iran’s strategic calculus and its implications for South‑Asian security.