Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

कांग्रेस नेता Jairam Ramesh ने अपर्याप्त EIA के कारण Great Nicobar Island परियोजना को चुनौती दी — रोकने की मांग

कांग्रेस नेता Jairam Ramesh ने 10 मई 2026 को Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav को पत्र लिखकर Great Nicobar Island विकास परियोजना को रोकने की मांग की, क्योंकि Environmental Impact Assessment अध्ययन अपर्याप्त हैं और ICRZ 2019 मानदंडों का उल्लंघन हुआ है। वे एक व्यापक, बहु‑मौसमी EIA, High‑Powered Committee रिपोर्ट की पारदर्शिता, और संसद में बहस की मांग करते हैं, जिससे परियोजना के पर्यावरणीय और रणनीतिक पहलुओं पर विवाद स्पष्ट होता है।
Congress leader Jairam Ramesh wrote to Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav on May 10, 2026 demanding a halt to the Great Nicobar Island development project, alleging that the environmental clearances are based on inadequate studies. Key Developments Ramesh claims the EIA for the port project is a "mockery" and was based on data collected over only a few days. He points out that the EMP cited by the government is not backed by comprehensive baseline studies covering at least three seasons. The letter cites the ICRZ Notification, 2019 clause 8(i)(c) which mandates a full EIA for projects in low‑ or medium‑eroding coastal stretches. Ramesh references two judgments of the NGT (April 3, 2023 and February 16, 2026) that highlight deficiencies in the clearance and the confidentiality claim of the HPC report. The opposition alleges that the Modi government is in "damage‑control mode" after Rahul Gandhi 's visit to the island on April 28, 2026, where he called the project a "biggest scam". Important Facts The government’s FAQ released on May 1, 2026 claims that the project balances strategic, economic and ecological priorities, and that indigenous community protection remains central. However, Ramesh argues that the baseline data required by the MoEF&CC for port‑specific EIA manuals demand at le
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. कांग्रेस नेता Jairam Ramesh ने अपर्याप्त EIA के कारण Great Nicobar Island परियोजना को चुनौती दी — रोकने की मांग
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs374% UPSC Relevance

EIA lapses force UPSC focus on Great Nicobar port’s legal and environmental scrutiny

Key Facts

  1. On 10 May 2026, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh wrote to Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav demanding a halt to the Great Nicobar Island port project.
  2. Ramesh alleges the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was based on data collected over only a few days, violating MoEF&CC guidelines that require at least two (preferably three) seasonal studies.
  3. The project falls under the Indian Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) Notification, 2019, clause 8(i)(c), which mandates a full EIA for developments in low‑ or medium‑eroding coastal stretches.
  4. Two National Green Tribunal (NGT) judgments – 3 April 2023 and 16 February 2026 – highlighted deficiencies in the clearance process and questioned the confidentiality of the High‑Powered Committee (HPC) report.
  5. Rahul Gandhi’s visit to Great Nicobar on 28 April 2026 amplified political scrutiny, with him labeling the project the "biggest scam".
  6. The government’s FAQ released on 1 May 2026 claims the project balances strategic, economic and ecological priorities, but Ramesh points out the absence of multi‑season baseline data required under MoEF&CC port‑specific EIA manuals.

Background & Context

The Great Nicobar port project sits at the intersection of strategic infrastructure, biodiversity conservation, and coastal regulation. Under the ICRZ Notification, 2019 and MoEF&CC EIA manuals, projects in ecologically sensitive zones must undergo rigorous, multi‑season assessments, and any lapse can be challenged in the National Green Tribunal, reflecting the constitutional mandate of sustainable development (Art. 48A) and the principle of federal oversight in environmental clearances.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

GS3•Environmental Impact AssessmentEssay•Environment and SustainabilityEssay•Economy, Development and InequalityGS3•Conservation, environmental pollution and degradationPrelims_GS•Ecology and BiodiversityPrelims_GS•Sustainable Development and InclusionGS4•Accountability, ethical governance and strengthening moral valuesEssay•Democracy, Governance and Public AdministrationPrelims_GS•Physical Geography of IndiaGS3•Indian Economy - Planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and employment

Mains Answer Angle

GS 3 (Environment) – Analyse the adequacy of EIA and EMP processes for coastal projects and the role of NGT and ICRZ norms; GS 2 (Polity) – Discuss the interplay between central ministries, parliamentary oversight, and judicial interventions in environmental governance.

Full Article

<p><strong>Congress leader Jairam Ramesh</strong> wrote to <strong>Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav</strong> on <strong>May 10, 2026</strong> demanding a halt to the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Great Nicobar Island — the southernmost island of the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, known for its unique biodiversity and strategic location (GS1: Geography, GS2: Polity)">Great Nicobar Island</span> development project, alleging that the environmental clearances are based on inadequate studies.</p> <h3>Key Developments</h3> <ul> <li>Ramesh claims the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) — a systematic process to evaluate the environmental consequences of a proposed project before decisions are made (GS3: Environment)">EIA</span> for the port project is a "mockery" and was based on data collected over only a few days.</li> <li>He points out that the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Environmental Management Plan (EMP) — a set of measures and actions designed to mitigate adverse environmental impacts identified in an EIA (GS3: Environment)">EMP</span> cited by the government is not backed by comprehensive baseline studies covering at least three seasons.</li> <li>The letter cites the <span class="key-term" data-definition="ICRZ Notification, 2019 — the Indian Coastal Regulation Zone rules that govern development activities along the coastline, requiring comprehensive EIA for projects in vulnerable zones (GS3: Environment, GS2: Polity)">ICRZ Notification, 2019</span> clause 8(i)(c) which mandates a full EIA for projects in low‑ or medium‑eroding coastal stretches.</li> <li>Ramesh references two judgments of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="National Green Tribunal (NGT) — a specialized judicial body for speedy disposal of environmental cases in India (GS3: Environment, GS4: Governance)">NGT</span> (April 3, 2023 and February 16, 2026) that highlight deficiencies in the clearance and the confidentiality claim of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="High‑Powered Committee (HPC) — a committee appointed by the court to review environmental clearances and recommend corrective actions (GS3: Environment, GS4: Governance)">HPC</span> report.</li> <li>The opposition alleges that the Modi government is in "damage‑control mode" after <strong>Rahul Gandhi</strong>'s visit to the island on April 28, 2026, where he called the project a "biggest scam".</li> </ul> <h3>Important Facts</h3> <p>The government’s FAQ released on May 1, 2026 claims that the project balances strategic, economic and ecological priorities, and that indigenous community protection remains central. However, Ramesh argues that the baseline data required by the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) — the central ministry responsible for environmental policy, clearances and regulation (GS3: Environment)">MoEF&CC</span> for port‑specific EIA manuals demand at le
Read Original on hindu

Analysis

Practice Questions

GS1
Easy
Prelims MCQ

कोस्टल रेगुलेशन ज़ोन (CRZ) मानदंड

1 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Medium
Mains Short Answer

पर्यावरण प्रभाव मूल्यांकन (EIA) और CRZ नियमावली

10 marks
6 keywords
GS3
Hard
Mains Essay

सतत विकास, रणनीतिक बुनियादी ढांचा, जैव विविधता संरक्षण

25 marks
8 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Quick Reference

Key Insight

EIA lapses force UPSC focus on Great Nicobar port’s legal and environmental scrutiny

Key Facts

  1. On 10 May 2026, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh wrote to Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav demanding a halt to the Great Nicobar Island port project.
  2. Ramesh alleges the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was based on data collected over only a few days, violating MoEF&CC guidelines that require at least two (preferably three) seasonal studies.
  3. The project falls under the Indian Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) Notification, 2019, clause 8(i)(c), which mandates a full EIA for developments in low‑ or medium‑eroding coastal stretches.
  4. Two National Green Tribunal (NGT) judgments – 3 April 2023 and 16 February 2026 – highlighted deficiencies in the clearance process and questioned the confidentiality of the High‑Powered Committee (HPC) report.
  5. Rahul Gandhi’s visit to Great Nicobar on 28 April 2026 amplified political scrutiny, with him labeling the project the "biggest scam".
  6. The government’s FAQ released on 1 May 2026 claims the project balances strategic, economic and ecological priorities, but Ramesh points out the absence of multi‑season baseline data required under MoEF&CC port‑specific EIA manuals.

Background

The Great Nicobar port project sits at the intersection of strategic infrastructure, biodiversity conservation, and coastal regulation. Under the ICRZ Notification, 2019 and MoEF&CC EIA manuals, projects in ecologically sensitive zones must undergo rigorous, multi‑season assessments, and any lapse can be challenged in the National Green Tribunal, reflecting the constitutional mandate of sustainable development (Art. 48A) and the principle of federal oversight in environmental clearances.

UPSC Syllabus

  • GS3 — Environmental Impact Assessment
  • Essay — Environment and Sustainability
  • Essay — Economy, Development and Inequality
  • GS3 — Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation
  • Prelims_GS — Ecology and Biodiversity
  • Prelims_GS — Sustainable Development and Inclusion
Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  • GS4 — Accountability, ethical governance and strengthening moral values
  • Essay — Democracy, Governance and Public Administration
  • Prelims_GS — Physical Geography of India
  • GS3 — Indian Economy - Planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and employment
  • Mains Angle

    GS 3 (Environment) – Analyse the adequacy of EIA and EMP processes for coastal projects and the role of NGT and ICRZ norms; GS 2 (Polity) – Discuss the interplay between central ministries, parliamentary oversight, and judicial interventions in environmental governance.

    कांग्रेस नेता Jairam Ramesh ने अपर्याप्त E... | UPSC Current Affairs