Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

PAC ने PMKVY की कौशल प्रशिक्षण और नौकरी की मांग के बीच असंगति की आलोचना की — CAG के निष्कर्षों ने धोखाधड़ी को उजागर किया

Public Accounts Committee, जो K.C. Venugopal के नेतृत्व में है, ने PMKVY योजना की आलोचना की क्योंकि यह युवाओं को कम‑मांग वाले क्षेत्रों में प्रशिक्षित कर रही है और CAG ऑडिट द्वारा उजागर किए गए धोखाधड़ी को उजागर किया। केवल 41% प्लेसमेंट और कौशल प्रशिक्षण तथा उद्योग की जरूरतों के बीच असंगति के साथ, समिति ने बेरोज़गारी और जबरन प्रवास को रोकने के लिए सुधारात्मक कार्रवाई का आह्वान किया।
The PAC chaired by K.C. Venugopal has taken a strong view against the flagship skill‑development programme, the PMKVY . Using the audit report of the CAG , the committee said the scheme largely trained candidates for jobs that have little market demand. Key Developments Audit reveals that 40% of trainees were placed in low‑demand sectors such as apparel, electronics and retail. High‑growth sectors like food processing received only 0.48% of trainees; tourism only 3.8% . Overall placement rate stands at 41% , far below the scheme’s objectives. Instances of fraud uncovered, e.g., a non‑existent firm Neelima Moving Pictures received certification for 33,493 participants. Government defends implementation by blaming State governments, the designated implementing agencies. Important Facts Since its launch in July 2015 , PMKVY has gone through three phases with a total outlay of about ₹14,450 crore . Of this, ₹10,194 crore was released and ₹9,261 crore spent. The scheme aimed to certify 1.32 crore candidates; it has so far certified 1.10 crore . The programme is administered by the MSDE . Despite the large financial outlay, the audit points to poor alignment between training and industry demand. UPSC Relevance Understanding the PMKVY episode helps aspirants in several ways: It illustrates the role of parliamentary oversight ( PAC ) in evaluating large‑scale welfare schemes. Shows how audit institutions like the CAG can expose systemic flaws and fraud. Highlights the challenge of skill training aligning with labour‑mark
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

PAC flags PMKVY’s skill‑training mismatch and fraud, urging stronger oversight

Key Facts

  1. PMKVY launched in July 2015 under Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
  2. Total outlay of the scheme is about ₹14,450 crore; ₹10,194 crore released and ₹9,261 crore spent.
  3. CAG audit found only 41% overall placement rate; 40% of trainees placed in low‑demand sectors.
  4. High‑growth sectors received minimal training: food processing 0.48%, tourism 3.8% of trainees.
  5. Fraud case: non‑existent firm Neelima Moving Pictures got certification for 33,493 participants.
  6. PAC, chaired by K.C. Venugopal, criticised the scheme for mismatch between training and market demand.

Background

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) examines government spending and can call out flaws in large schemes. The CAG audit of PMKVY highlighted poor alignment of skill training with industry needs and instances of fraud, raising concerns about governance and fiscal accountability.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Essay — Youth, Health and Welfare
  • GS2 — Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functions
  • GS2 — Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privileges
  • Essay — Economy, Development and Inequality
  • GS2 — Functions and responsibilities of Union and States

Mains Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how parliamentary oversight and audit institutions can improve policy implementation, linking it to skill‑training and unemployment. Relevant for GS‑2 (Polity) and GS‑3 (Economy).

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. PAC ने PMKVY की कौशल प्रशिक्षण और नौकरी की मांग के बीच असंगति की आलोचना की — CAG के निष्कर्षों ने धोखाधड़ी को उजागर किया
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

gs.gs270% UPSC Relevance

Full Article

The PAC chaired by K.C. Venugopal has taken a strong view against the flagship skill‑development programme, the PMKVY. Using the audit report of the CAG, the committee said the scheme largely trained candidates for jobs that have little market demand.

Key Developments

  • Audit reveals that 40% of trainees were placed in low‑demand sectors such as apparel, electronics and retail.
  • High‑growth sectors like food processing received only 0.48% of trainees; tourism only 3.8%.
  • Overall placement rate stands at 41%, far below the scheme’s objectives.
  • Instances of fraud uncovered, e.g., a non‑existent firm Neelima Moving Pictures received certification for 33,493 participants.
  • Government defends implementation by blaming State governments, the designated implementing agencies.

Important Facts

Since its launch in July 2015, PMKVY has gone through three phases with a total outlay of about ₹14,450 crore. Of this, ₹10,194 crore was released and ₹9,261 crore spent. The scheme aimed to certify 1.32 crore candidates; it has so far certified 1.10 crore.

The programme is administered by the MSDE. Despite the large financial outlay, the audit points to poor alignment between training and industry demand.

UPSC Relevance

Understanding the PMKVY episode helps aspirants in several ways:

  • It illustrates the role of parliamentary oversight (PAC) in evaluating large‑scale welfare schemes.
  • Shows how audit institutions like the CAG can expose systemic flaws and fraud.
  • Highlights the challenge of skill training aligning with labour‑mark
Read Original on hindu

PAC flags PMKVY’s skill‑training mismatch and fraud, urging stronger oversight

Key Facts

  1. PMKVY launched in July 2015 under Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
  2. Total outlay of the scheme is about ₹14,450 crore; ₹10,194 crore released and ₹9,261 crore spent.
  3. CAG audit found only 41% overall placement rate; 40% of trainees placed in low‑demand sectors.
  4. High‑growth sectors received minimal training: food processing 0.48%, tourism 3.8% of trainees.
  5. Fraud case: non‑existent firm Neelima Moving Pictures got certification for 33,493 participants.
  6. PAC, chaired by K.C. Venugopal, criticised the scheme for mismatch between training and market demand.

Background & Context

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) examines government spending and can call out flaws in large schemes. The CAG audit of PMKVY highlighted poor alignment of skill training with industry needs and instances of fraud, raising concerns about governance and fiscal accountability.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Essay•Youth, Health and WelfareGS2•Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functionsGS2•Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privilegesEssay•Economy, Development and InequalityGS2•Functions and responsibilities of Union and States

Mains Answer Angle

In a Mains answer, discuss how parliamentary oversight and audit institutions can improve policy implementation, linking it to skill‑training and unemployment. Relevant for GS‑2 (Polity) and GS‑3 (Economy).

Analysis

Practice Questions

GS2
Easy
Prelims MCQ

CAG ऑडिट और PAC निगरानी

2 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

कौशल प्रशिक्षण असंगति और धोखाधड़ी

5 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

संसदीय निगरानी और नीति कार्यान्वयन

250 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.