Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal Criticises Denial of Anticipatory Bail to Ex‑TISS Students Over Saibaba Tribute

On 10 August 2026, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal condemned a Mumbai court's denial of anticipatory bail to two ex‑TISS students who held an unauthorised Saibaba tribute and shouted slogans for under‑trial activists, raising concerns about governmental intolerance, policing, and judicial independence.
Overview On 10 August 2026 , Rajya Sabha member Kapil Sibal condemned a Mumbai court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail to two former students of the TISS . The students had organised an unauthorised gathering to pay homage to the late professor G.N. Saibaba and to chant slogans demanding the release of under‑trial activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam . The episode raises questions about governmental tolerance, policing, and judicial independence. Key Developments The Additional Sessions Judge V.B. Bohra denied anticipatory bail to Kamakhya Das (23) and Abhirup Paul (32) . Seven other students – Uttkarsh Khuntia, Yash Kaundilya, Avantika, Ishpreet Kaur, Nikita Monica D'Souza, Hardika Bhagat and Satyam Yadav – were granted anticipatory bail after cooperating with the investigation. The court noted that while paying tribute to Saibaba was not illegal, the use of the phrase “ Rest in Power (1967‑Forever) ” and slogans supporting under‑trials raised doubts about the accused’s intent. Electronic devices seized from Das and Paul contained downloaded books of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) . The court said mere downloading is not an offence but required custodial interrogation to ascertain intent. Police investigation, transferred to the Crime Investigation Department (CID), was initiated after a complaint by an associate dean of TISS. Important Facts The incident occurred on 12 October 2025 when 10‑12 students gathered at the TISS hostel without administrative permission. They displayed Saibaba’s photographs, lit candles, read his poems, and displayed the message “Rest in Power (1967‑Forever)”. They also raised slogans for the release of Khalid and Imam, both detained under the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) — Anti‑terror law that allows detention o
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Court denies bail to ex‑TISS students, sparking debate on civil liberties vs security

Key Facts

  1. 10 Aug 2026: Additional Sessions Judge V.B. Bohra ने Kamakhya Das (23) और Abhirup Paul (32) को anticipatory bail नहीं दी।
  2. सात अन्य TISS छात्रों को बाद में जांच में सहयोग करने के बाद anticipatory bail दी गई।
  3. घटना 12 Oct 2025 को हुई जब 10‑12 छात्रों ने TISS हॉस्टल में अनुमति के बिना इकट्ठा किया।
  4. छात्रों ने Prof G.N. Saibaba की फोटो प्रदर्शित की, मोमबत्तियाँ जलाईं और नारा “Rest in Power (1967‑Forever)” इस्तेमाल किया।
  5. उन्होंने Umar Khalid और Sharjeel Imam, दोनों को UAPA के तहत हिरासत में रहने वाले अंडर‑ट्रायल कार्यकर्ताओं की रिहाई के लिए नारे लगाए।
  6. पुलिस ने लैपटॉप जब्त किए जिनमें प्रतिबंधित Communist Party of India (Maoist) की डाउनलोड की गई साहित्य थी।
  7. राज्यसभा MP Kapil Sibal ने जमानत न देने को सरकारी असहिष्णुता का संकेत कहा।

Background

Anticipatory bail, provided under CrPC Section 438, is a pre‑emptive safeguard against arrest. The case tests how courts balance this right with security provisions of the UAPA, an anti‑terror law often invoked against dissent. It also raises questions about judicial independence and freedom of expression on campuses.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning

Mains Angle

In GS‑2, candidates can discuss the conflict between civil liberties and security laws, using this case to illustrate the judiciary’s role in protecting constitutional rights while addressing terrorism concerns.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Burning Issues
  6. Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal Criticises Denial of Anticipatory Bail to Ex‑TISS Students Over Saibaba Tribute
GS270% Exam RelevanceBurning Issues
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

On 10 August 2026, Rajya Sabha member Kapil Sibal condemned a Mumbai court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail to two former students of the TISS. The students had organised an unauthorised gathering to pay homage to the late professor G.N. Saibaba and to chant slogans demanding the release of under‑trial activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. The episode raises questions about governmental tolerance, policing, and judicial independence.

Key Developments

  • The Additional Sessions Judge V.B. Bohra denied anticipatory bail to Kamakhya Das (23) and Abhirup Paul (32).
  • Seven other students – Uttkarsh Khuntia, Yash Kaundilya, Avantika, Ishpreet Kaur, Nikita Monica D'Souza, Hardika Bhagat and Satyam Yadav – were granted anticipatory bail after cooperating with the investigation.
  • The court noted that while paying tribute to Saibaba was not illegal, the use of the phrase “Rest in Power (1967‑Forever)” and slogans supporting under‑trials raised doubts about the accused’s intent.
  • Electronic devices seized from Das and Paul contained downloaded books of the Communist Party of India (Maoist). The court said mere downloading is not an offence but required custodial interrogation to ascertain intent.
  • Police investigation, transferred to the Crime Investigation Department (CID), was initiated after a complaint by an associate dean of TISS.

Important Facts

The incident occurred on 12 October 2025 when 10‑12 students gathered at the TISS hostel without administrative permission. They displayed Saibaba’s photographs, lit candles, read his poems, and displayed the message “Rest in Power (1967‑Forever)”. They also raised slogans for the release of Khalid and Imam, both detained under the

Read Original on hindu

Court denies bail to ex‑TISS students, sparking debate on civil liberties vs security

Key Facts

  1. 10 Aug 2026: Additional Sessions Judge V.B. Bohra ने Kamakhya Das (23) और Abhirup Paul (32) को anticipatory bail नहीं दी।
  2. सात अन्य TISS छात्रों को बाद में जांच में सहयोग करने के बाद anticipatory bail दी गई।
  3. घटना 12 Oct 2025 को हुई जब 10‑12 छात्रों ने TISS हॉस्टल में अनुमति के बिना इकट्ठा किया।
  4. छात्रों ने Prof G.N. Saibaba की फोटो प्रदर्शित की, मोमबत्तियाँ जलाईं और नारा “Rest in Power (1967‑Forever)” इस्तेमाल किया।
  5. उन्होंने Umar Khalid और Sharjeel Imam, दोनों को UAPA के तहत हिरासत में रहने वाले अंडर‑ट्रायल कार्यकर्ताओं की रिहाई के लिए नारे लगाए।
  6. पुलिस ने लैपटॉप जब्त किए जिनमें प्रतिबंधित Communist Party of India (Maoist) की डाउनलोड की गई साहित्य थी।
  7. राज्यसभा MP Kapil Sibal ने जमानत न देने को सरकारी असहिष्णुता का संकेत कहा।

Background & Context

Anticipatory bail, provided under CrPC Section 438, is a pre‑emptive safeguard against arrest. The case tests how courts balance this right with security provisions of the UAPA, an anti‑terror law often invoked against dissent. It also raises questions about judicial independence and freedom of expression on campuses.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning

Mains Answer Angle

In GS‑2, candidates can discuss the conflict between civil liberties and security laws, using this case to illustrate the judiciary’s role in protecting constitutional rights while addressing terrorism concerns.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Criminal Procedure Code – Anticipatory bail

1 marks
3 keywords
GS2
Medium
Mains Short Answer

UAPA and freedom of expression

10 marks
5 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Judicial independence and civil liberties

25 marks
6 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal Criticises Deni... | UPSC Current Affairs