Supreme Court Daily Round‑Up – 2 April 2026 The apex bench delivered a series of judgments that ranged from administrative discipline to environmental protection. The most headline‑grabbing order chastised the West Bengal government for assaulting judges on SIR duty and directed the deployment of central forces . Simultaneously, the Court clarified procedural rules on departmental enquiries, bail, and financial‑sector statutes. Key Developments Attack on Judges in West Bengal : The Court slammed state officials for violence against judges during surprise inspections, ordering the use of central forces and directing the INC candidate removed from the electoral roll to approach the appellate tribunal. Departmental Enquiry Evidence : In a departmental enquiry, the Court held that a document not admitted by an employee must be proved through witness testimony. Bail Cancellation – Satinder Singh Bhasin : Bail was revoked for failure to settle claims in the Grand Venice project. Procedural Clarifications : The Court ruled that dismissal of an appeal against an ex‑parte decree does not bar filing an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC . Financial‑Sector Rulings : The bench affirmed that a borrower’s redemption right under the SARFAESI Act is not lost by an auction sale if the balance consideration is paid after the stipulated time. FEMA Interpretation : Non‑confirmation of seizure under Section 37A of the FEMA influences adjudication proceedings. Environmental Protection : The Court stayed Rajasthan’s decision to denotify parts of the Chambal sanctuary, raising concerns over illegal sand mining. Important Facts The order on West Bengal was delivered on 3 April 2026 , emphasizing the need for central assistance to safeguard judicial independence. In the departmental enquiry case, the Court stressed the principle of “burden of proof” shifting to the employer when documentary evidence is absent. The SARFAESI decision clarified that the right to redeem a mortgaged property survives an auction, provided the balance is paid, reinforcing borrower protection. The FEMA ruling linked procedural compliance of seizure confirmation to the outcome of adjudication, highlighting the interplay between foreign exchange law and dispute resolution. The Chambal sanctuary stay underscores the Court’s proactive stance on wildlife conservation and illegal mining, aligning with India’s commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity . UPSC Relevance These judgments touch upon multiple GS papers: GS 2 (Polity) : Judicial independence, the role of the Supreme Court, and the use of central forces in maintaining law and order. GS 3 (Economy & Law) : Interpretation of the SARFAESI Act, FEMA , and procedural aspects of the CPC . GS 4 (Ethics & Integrity) : The Court’s admonition of state officials for violating the sanctity of the judiciary reflects ethical standards expected of public servants. GS 1 (Environment) : The Chambal sanctuary order illustrates the legal mechanisms for wildlife protection and the challenges of illegal mining. Way Forward for Aspirants 1. Track Supreme Court pronouncements regularly; they often set precedents that appear in answer‑writing and interview questions. 2. Map each judgment to relevant GS topics to build a quick‑reference matrix for revision. 3. Practice answer framing by linking judicial decisions to constitutional provisions (e.g., Article 21, Article 19) and policy implications. 4. Stay updated on environmental jurisprudence , as the Court increasingly intervenes in conservation matters, a high‑frequency UPSC theme.