<h2>Supreme Court Directions on Encroachments in SMTR</h2>
<p>The Supreme Court, alarmed by large‑scale illegal occupation in the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Srivilliputhur‑Megamalai Tiger Reserve (SMTR) — a protected area in Tamil Nadu that forms the upper catchment of the Vaigai River and is part of the Agasthyamalai Biosphere (GS2: Polity, GS3: Environment)">SMTR</span>, issued a set of strict orders to restore the forest and enforce wildlife laws.</p>
<h3>Key Developments</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Only 66 out of 4,601</strong> encroachers have been relocated; <strong>52.86 ha</strong> of <strong>5,072.65 ha</strong> encroached land recovered.</li>
<li>The Court directed the State to submit a <strong>division‑wise eviction plan</strong> within <strong>one month</strong>, detailing timelines, responsibilities, rehabilitation and restoration measures.</li>
<li>All government facilities (PDS outlets, Anganwadi centres, schools) inside the reserve must be <strong>discontinued, relocated or dismantled within six months</strong>.</li>
<li>Disciplinary and legal action against <strong>118 serving and retired government employees</strong> identified as encroachers, under the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973 — service rules governing conduct, discipline and penalties for state employees (GS2: Polity)">Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules</span>.</li>
<li>Illegal resorts and tourism infrastructure in the Megamalai region are to be made non‑operational and dismantled under supervision of the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Central Empowered Committee (CEC) — a high‑level committee appointed by the Supreme Court to monitor and guide implementation of its orders in forest matters (GS2: Polity, GS3: Environment)">CEC</span>.</li>
<li>Protection of officials involved in eviction work, except for cases of mala‑fide action, and provision for paramilitary assistance if the State fails to comply.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Important Facts</h3>
<p>The reserve hosts the upper catchment of the Vaigai River, making it ecologically sensitive. Over <strong>4,600 people</strong> occupy more than <strong>5,000 hectares</strong> of reserved forest. Despite years of enforcement, progress has been negligible, prompting the Court’s intervention.</p>
<p>Specific directives include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Preparation of an eviction plan with clear milestones and officer‑level responsibilities.</li>
<li>Continuous monitoring by the State Law Department of all pending encroachment cases.</li>
<li>Imposition of environmental restitution charges to be deposited with the <span class="key-term" data-definition="Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) — body that manages funds for afforestation and forest restoration under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 (GS3: Environment)">CAMPA</span> and used only for ecological restoration.</li>
<li>A moratorium on welfare schemes, utili
Loading page, please wait…