Overview On December 21, 2025 , senior BJP leader Rajendra Rathore countered former chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s assertion that the Union Government’s report redefining the Aravalli Hills would devastate 90% of the mountain range in Rajasthan. Rathore argued that the new framework establishes stricter conservation guidelines. The debate centers on the balance between environmental protection and potential economic activities in the region, a key area of focus for UPSC aspirants. Key Developments Supreme Court Ruling On November 20, 2025 , the Supreme Court accepted the recommendations of a committee under the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change regarding the definition of Aravalli Hills and Ranges . This decision has significant implications for environmental policy and resource management. New Definition of Aravalli Hills Aravalli Hill: Any landform in designated Aravalli districts with an elevation of 100 metres or more above its local relief. Aravalli Range: A collection of two or more such hills within 500 metres of each other. Rathore emphasized that the 100-metre criterion includes slopes and terrain within 500 metres between hills, effectively keeping these areas outside the mining ambit. This is a crucial detail for understanding the scope of the new definition. Mining Restrictions and Conservation Efforts Rathore stated that approximately 25% of the Aravalli area falls under wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, and reserved forests where mining is completely prohibited. He added that only about 2.56% of the notified Aravalli region is under limited and strictly regulated mining. These figures are important for assessing the actual impact of mining activities on the Aravalli range. Government Assurances Rathore cited a Survey of India analysis, assuring that mining will not expand under the new definition. He also mentioned that Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav clarified that the Supreme Court order poses no threat to the Aravalli range and that the Centre is committed to its complete protection. These assurances are relevant for understanding the government's stance on the issue. Supreme Court Directives The Supreme Court has directed that no new mining leases can be issued until the Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) completes detailed scientific mapping and prepares a sustainable mining management plan. This directive highlights the importance of scientific assessment and sustainable practices in resource management. Political Context Rathore criticized Gehlot’s “Save Aravalli” social media campaign, noting the lack of support from senior Congress leaders. He alleged that this was political posturing rather than a genuine environmental movement. This political dimension adds another layer to the issue, relevant for understanding the dynamics of environmental policy. UPSC Relevance This news article is relevant for GS3: Environment and Ecology , specifically concerning conservation efforts, environmental policy, and resource management. The redefinition of the Aravalli Hills and the debate surrounding its potential impact are important topics for Mains examination. Understanding the roles of the Supreme Court , the government, and various stakeholders in environmental governance is crucial. Important Facts for UPSC Date of Supreme Court acceptance: November 20, 2025 Elevation criterion for Aravalli Hill: 100 meters or more Distance criterion for Aravalli Range: within 500 meters Percentage of Aravalli area under wildlife sanctuaries: approximately 25% Percentage of Aravalli region under regulated mining: about 2.56% Role of ICFRE: Mapping and mining plan preparation