Overview
Shashi Tharoor, a Congress Member of Parliament, voiced strong opposition to the proposed G RAM G Bill during a session in the Lok Sabha. He characterized the bill as a retrograde move, suggesting it reverses progress and negatively impacts India's dedication to its most vulnerable citizens.
Key Arguments
- Retrogressive Nature: Tharoor argued that the bill takes India backward in terms of social progress.
- Impact on Vulnerable Citizens: He emphasized the bill's potential to harm the interests and protections afforded to vulnerable populations.
- Undermining Commitment: Tharoor stated that the bill weakens India's commitment to safeguarding the rights and welfare of its disadvantaged citizens.
Exam Relevance
This news item is relevant to the UPSC Civil Services Examination, particularly under GS Paper 2 (Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International relations). It touches upon aspects of government policies, parliamentary procedures, and the protection of vulnerable sections of society.
Potential Exam Questions
- Prelims: Which MP opposed the G RAM G Bill? What term did he use to describe the bill?
- Mains: Analyze the role of parliamentary opposition in influencing government policy. Discuss the ethical considerations in policymaking concerning vulnerable populations.
Key Terms
- Lok Sabha: The lower house of the Indian Parliament, where elected representatives debate and legislate laws.
- Retrograde: Moving backward; reverting to an earlier or less advanced state.
- Vulnerable Citizens: Individuals or groups facing socio-economic disadvantages and requiring state protection.