Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Gene Drives and CRISPR: Prospects, Risks and Policy Debates for Vector Control (2026)

Gene drives, powered by CRISPR/Cas9, offer a potential breakthrough in controlling malaria‑carrying mosquitoes, but they pose ecological and biosafety risks. International bodies like WHO recommend phased testing and self‑limiting designs, urging India to weigh benefits against hazards and build strong regulatory and public‑consent frameworks.
Overview Gene‑based technologies are being touted as a way to curb malaria, dengue and other vector‑borne diseases. The core idea is to insert a gene drive into mosquitoes so that the trait spreads rapidly. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 have turned this concept from theory to practice. However, the technology raises ecological, biosafety and governance questions that India and the world must address before field release. Key Developments 2003: Evolutionary biologist Austin Burt proposed the theoretical basis of super‑Mendelian inheritance. Recent years: Laboratory‑tested drives that either suppress mosquito populations or render them resistant to Plasmodium parasites. Emerging designs such as daisy‑chain drives , reversal drives and split‑drive systems aim to improve safety. International bodies – the WHO and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences – have drafted phased testing frameworks that stress ecological data and community consent. Important Facts • A single infected mosquito can transmit malaria to dozens of people; a single gene can spread through the mosquito population over several generations. • Natural transposable elements illustrate how genetic material can selfishly replicate, but host resistance usually limits damage. • Engineered drives differ from natural drivers because they are designed to spread faster and for a specific purpose, such as population suppression or pathogen resistance. UPSC Relevance Understanding gene drives touches upon several GS papers: GS3 – Environment and Ecology (impact on biodiversity, invasive species, bio‑control), GS2 – Polity (regulatory frameworks, international guidelines), and <strong
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

CRISPR gene drives could curb malaria, but demand strong Indian regulation and ethics.

Key Facts

  1. 2003: Austin Burt ने सुपर‑मेंडेलियन इनहेरिटेंस का प्रस्ताव रखा, जो जीन ड्राइव्स का सैद्धांतिक आधार है।
  2. जीन ड्राइव्स CRISPR/Cas9 का उपयोग करके मच्छर DNA को संपादित करते हैं और इनहेरिटेंस को पक्षपाती बनाते हैं, जिससे कुछ पीढ़ियों में >90% संतानों में यह विशेषता फैलती है।
  3. लैब‑टेस्टेड ड्राइव्स या तो मच्छर जनसंख्या को दबाते हैं या उन्हें Plasmodium (मलेरिया परजीवी) के प्रति प्रतिरोधी बनाते हैं।
  4. डेज़ी‑चेन, स्प्लिट‑ड्राइव और रिवर्सल ड्राइव जैसे स्व‑सीमित डिज़ाइन अनियंत्रित प्रसार को रोकने के लिए विकसित किए गए हैं।
  5. WHO और U.S. National Academies ने चरणबद्ध परीक्षण दिशानिर्देश जारी किए हैं जो पारिस्थितिक डेटा और सामुदायिक सहमति की आवश्यकता रखते हैं।
  6. भारत में, Department of Biotechnology (DBT) और Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) जीन‑ड्राइव रिलीज़ के प्रमुख नियामक निकाय हैं।
  7. एक एकल संक्रमित मच्छर मलेरिया को दर्जनों तक पहुंचा सकता है; एक सफल जीन‑ड्राइव संभावित रूप से संचरण को >80% तक कम कर सकता है।

Background

Gene‑drive technology sits at the intersection of biotechnology, public health and environmental governance. It links GS3 (environment and biodiversity) with GS2 (regulatory frameworks) and GS4 (ethical considerations) in the UPSC syllabus.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — Biology and Health
  • Essay — Science, Technology and Society
  • Prelims_CSAT — Basic Numeracy
  • GS1 — Poverty and Developmental Issues
  • Prelims_GS — Ecology and Biodiversity
  • GS3 — IT, Space, Computers, Robotics, Nano-technology, Bio-technology and IPR
  • GS1 — Population and Associated Issues

Mains Angle

In Mains, candidates can discuss the need for a risk‑benefit assessment and a robust regulatory framework for gene‑drive deployment. Likely question: "Evaluate the prospects and challenges of using gene‑drive technology for malaria control in India." (GS3/GS2).

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Science
  5. Sci-Tech Developments & Innovation
  6. Gene Drives and CRISPR: Prospects, Risks and Policy Debates for Vector Control (2026)
GS375% Exam RelevanceSci-Tech Developments & Innovation
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

Gene‑based technologies are being touted as a way to curb malaria, dengue and other vector‑borne diseases. The core idea is to insert a gene drive into mosquitoes so that the trait spreads rapidly. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 have turned this concept from theory to practice. However, the technology raises ecological, biosafety and governance questions that India and the world must address before field release.

Key Developments

  • 2003: Evolutionary biologist Austin Burt proposed the theoretical basis of super‑Mendelian inheritance.
  • Recent years: Laboratory‑tested drives that either suppress mosquito populations or render them resistant to Plasmodium parasites.
  • Emerging designs such as daisy‑chain drives, reversal drives and split‑drive systems aim to improve safety.
  • International bodies – the WHO and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences – have drafted phased testing frameworks that stress ecological data and community consent.

Important Facts

• A single infected mosquito can transmit malaria to dozens of people; a single gene can spread through the mosquito population over several generations.

• Natural transposable elements illustrate how genetic material can selfishly replicate, but host resistance usually limits damage.

• Engineered drives differ from natural drivers because they are designed to spread faster and for a specific purpose, such as population suppression or pathogen resistance.

Exam Relevance

Understanding gene drives touches upon several GS papers: GS3 – Environment and Ecology (impact on biodiversity, invasive species, bio‑control), GS2 – Polity (regulatory frameworks, international guidelines), and

Read Original on hindu

CRISPR gene drives could curb malaria, but demand strong Indian regulation and ethics.

Key Facts

  1. 2003: Austin Burt ने सुपर‑मेंडेलियन इनहेरिटेंस का प्रस्ताव रखा, जो जीन ड्राइव्स का सैद्धांतिक आधार है।
  2. जीन ड्राइव्स CRISPR/Cas9 का उपयोग करके मच्छर DNA को संपादित करते हैं और इनहेरिटेंस को पक्षपाती बनाते हैं, जिससे कुछ पीढ़ियों में >90% संतानों में यह विशेषता फैलती है।
  3. लैब‑टेस्टेड ड्राइव्स या तो मच्छर जनसंख्या को दबाते हैं या उन्हें Plasmodium (मलेरिया परजीवी) के प्रति प्रतिरोधी बनाते हैं।
  4. डेज़ी‑चेन, स्प्लिट‑ड्राइव और रिवर्सल ड्राइव जैसे स्व‑सीमित डिज़ाइन अनियंत्रित प्रसार को रोकने के लिए विकसित किए गए हैं।
  5. WHO और U.S. National Academies ने चरणबद्ध परीक्षण दिशानिर्देश जारी किए हैं जो पारिस्थितिक डेटा और सामुदायिक सहमति की आवश्यकता रखते हैं।
  6. भारत में, Department of Biotechnology (DBT) और Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) जीन‑ड्राइव रिलीज़ के प्रमुख नियामक निकाय हैं।
  7. एक एकल संक्रमित मच्छर मलेरिया को दर्जनों तक पहुंचा सकता है; एक सफल जीन‑ड्राइव संभावित रूप से संचरण को >80% तक कम कर सकता है।

Background & Context

Gene‑drive technology sits at the intersection of biotechnology, public health and environmental governance. It links GS3 (environment and biodiversity) with GS2 (regulatory frameworks) and GS4 (ethical considerations) in the UPSC syllabus.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•Biology and HealthEssay•Science, Technology and SocietyPrelims_CSAT•Basic NumeracyGS1•Poverty and Developmental IssuesPrelims_GS•Ecology and BiodiversityGS3•IT, Space, Computers, Robotics, Nano-technology, Bio-technology and IPRGS1•Population and Associated Issues

Mains Answer Angle

In Mains, candidates can discuss the need for a risk‑benefit assessment and a robust regulatory framework for gene‑drive deployment. Likely question: "Evaluate the prospects and challenges of using gene‑drive technology for malaria control in India." (GS3/GS2).

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Easy
Prelims MCQ

Regulatory frameworks for synthetic biology

1 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Medium
Mains Short Answer

Ethical and ecological trade‑offs of engineered organisms

5 marks
4 keywords
GS3
Hard
Mains Essay

Gene‑drive technology for malaria control, policy debates, biodiversity risk

25 marks
7 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Gene Drives and CRISPR: Prospects, Risks a... | UPSC Current Affairs

Related Topics

  • 📚Subject TopicBiodiversity Credits for Environment Conservation
  • 📚Subject TopicBalancing Climate Goals and Biodiversity Protection
  • 📚Subject TopicSundarbans: Flora, Fauna, and Biodiversity
  • 📰Current AffairsGene Drives and CRISPR: Prospects, Risks and Policy Debates for Vector Control (2026)
  • 📰Current AffairsGene Drives and CRISPR: Prospects, Risks and Policy Debates for Vector Control (2026)
  • 📖Glossary TermBiodiversity Hotspot