Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Lok Sabha Passes Supreme Court Judges Amendment Bill, Overriding Ordinance Amid Opposition Slogans

On 3 August 2026, the Lok Sabha approved the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, replacing an ordinance that had increased judges from 34 to 38, despite opposition slogans and a rejected statutory resolution. The episode underscores parliamentary procedures, the contentious Supreme Court Collegium system, and the government's push for judicial and vital‑statistics reforms.
Overview The Lok Sabha on 3 August 2026 approved the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 . The bill replaces an earlier ordinance that had increased the strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The passage occurred without any substantive debate, as opposition members continued to chant slogans on unrelated issues such as NEET paper leaks and alleged misuse of Ram temple donations. Key Developments The bill was introduced after a brief remark by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal . A statutory resolution moved by opposition members condemning the ordinance was rejected by a voice vote . Despite continued sloganeering, the bill was put to a vote and cleared. In the same session, a separate bill amending the births and deaths registration was also passed without debate. After the passage, the House was adjourned for the day. Important Facts The amendment raises the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court to 38 judges. The move follows criticism of the Supreme Court Collegium for opaque recommendations, highlighted by Justice Bhuyan’s remarks on potential “bad appointments”. UPSC Relevance Understanding this episode helps aspirants in several ways: It illustrates the legislative process: how an ordinance can be superseded by a bill after parliamentary approval. Shows the role of the Lok Sabha in scrutinising judicial reforms. Highlights the functioning and criticism of the Collegium system , a frequent GS2 topic. Demonstrates parliamentary tactics such as voice votes and the use of statutory resolutions to register dissent. Way Forward Future sessions may see more rigorous debate on judicial appointments, especially concerning the transparency of the Collegium . Opposition parties could push for a legislative framework governing judge selection to curb “bad appointments”. Additionally, the passage of the births‑and‑deaths registration amendment signals the government’s intent to streamline vital statistics, which could impact policy planning and social welfare schemes.
Loading article...

Quick Reference

Key Insight

Lok Sabha boosts Supreme Court judges to 38, overriding ordinance – a test of parliamentary oversight

Key Facts

  1. 3 August 2026: Lok Sabha passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026.
  2. The bill raises the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the CJI.
  3. It replaces a presidential ordinance that had earlier increased the strength to 38 judges.
  4. Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal introduced the bill in the House.
  5. The bill was cleared by voice vote; a statutory resolution by opposition members was rejected.
  6. In the same session, an amendment to the Births and Deaths Registration Act was also passed without debate.
  7. The episode reflects criticism of the Supreme Court Collegium’s opaque appointment process.

Background

The event illustrates the constitutional process where an ordinance, a temporary law issued by the President, must be approved or replaced by a parliamentary bill within six weeks. It also shows the Lok Sabha’s role in scrutinising judicial reforms and the growing demand for transparency in the Collegium system of judge appointments.

UPSC Syllabus

  • Prelims_GS — National Current Affairs
  • Prelims_GS — Constitution and Political System
  • GS2 — Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privileges
  • GS2 — Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioning
  • Prelims_CSAT — Reading Comprehension

Mains Angle

GS‑2 question could ask about the need for a legislative framework for judicial appointments and how Parliament can check the judiciary. Candidates may discuss the balance between judicial independence and accountability.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Legislation & Institutional Governance
  6. Lok Sabha Passes Supreme Court Judges Amendment Bill, Overriding Ordinance Amid Opposition Slogans
GS274% Exam RelevanceLegislation & Institutional Governance
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

The Lok Sabha on 3 August 2026 approved the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026. The bill replaces an earlier ordinance that had increased the strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The passage occurred without any substantive debate, as opposition members continued to chant slogans on unrelated issues such as NEET paper leaks and alleged misuse of Ram temple donations.

Key Developments

  • The bill was introduced after a brief remark by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal.
  • A statutory resolution moved by opposition members condemning the ordinance was rejected by a voice vote.
  • Despite continued sloganeering, the bill was put to a vote and cleared.
  • In the same session, a separate bill amending the births and deaths registration was also passed without debate.
  • After the passage, the House was adjourned for the day.

Important Facts

The amendment raises the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court to 38 judges. The move follows criticism of the Supreme Court Collegium for opaque recommendations, highlighted by Justice Bhuyan’s remarks on potential “bad appointments”.

Exam Relevance

Understanding this episode helps aspirants in several ways:

  • It illustrates the legislative process: how an ordinance can be superseded by a bill after parliamentary approval.
  • Shows the role of the Lok Sabha in scrutinising judicial reforms.
  • Highlights the functioning and criticism of the Collegium system, a frequent GS2 topic.
  • Demonstrates parliamentary tactics such as voice votes and the use of statutory resolutions to register dissent.

Way Forward

Future sessions may see more rigorous debate on judicial appointments, especially concerning the transparency of the Collegium. Opposition parties could push for a legislative framework governing judge selection to curb “bad appointments”. Additionally, the passage of the births‑and‑deaths registration amendment signals the government’s intent to streamline vital statistics, which could impact policy planning and social welfare schemes.

Read Original on hindu

Lok Sabha boosts Supreme Court judges to 38, overriding ordinance – a test of parliamentary oversight

Key Facts

  1. 3 August 2026: Lok Sabha passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026.
  2. The bill raises the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the CJI.
  3. It replaces a presidential ordinance that had earlier increased the strength to 38 judges.
  4. Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal introduced the bill in the House.
  5. The bill was cleared by voice vote; a statutory resolution by opposition members was rejected.
  6. In the same session, an amendment to the Births and Deaths Registration Act was also passed without debate.
  7. The episode reflects criticism of the Supreme Court Collegium’s opaque appointment process.

Background & Context

The event illustrates the constitutional process where an ordinance, a temporary law issued by the President, must be approved or replaced by a parliamentary bill within six weeks. It also shows the Lok Sabha’s role in scrutinising judicial reforms and the growing demand for transparency in the Collegium system of judge appointments.

UPSC Syllabus Connections

Prelims_GS•National Current AffairsPrelims_GS•Constitution and Political SystemGS2•Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, powers and privilegesGS2•Executive and Judiciary - structure, organization and functioningPrelims_CSAT•Reading Comprehension

Mains Answer Angle

GS‑2 question could ask about the need for a legislative framework for judicial appointments and how Parliament can check the judiciary. Candidates may discuss the balance between judicial independence and accountability.

Analysis

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Practice Questions

GS2
Medium
Prelims MCQ

Parliamentary Procedure – Ordinance vs Bill

1 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Easy
Mains Short Answer

Judicial Capacity and Case Backlog

5 marks
4 keywords
GS2
Hard
Mains Essay

Judicial Appointments – Collegium vs Legislative Model

20 marks
5 keywords
Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Lok Sabha Passes Supreme Court Judges Amen... | UPSC Current Affairs