Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutBest UPSC AIUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 4 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle
Mains Evaluator

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Opposition questions denial of bail to Umar, Sharjeel; flags Gurmeet Ram Rahim's 15th parole — UPSC Current Affairs | January 5, 2026
Opposition questions denial of bail to Umar, Sharjeel; flags Gurmeet Ram Rahim's 15th parole
Opposition leaders questioned the Supreme Court's denial of bail to activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots case, contrasting it with the repeated parole granted to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, highlighting concerns about selective justice and the use of UAPA. This raises important questions about the balance between national security and individual liberties, relevant for UPSC GS2 and GS3.
Overview On January 5, 2026 , opposition leaders raised concerns regarding the Supreme Court's decision to deny bail to activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case . These concerns were amplified by the repeated granting of parole to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh , the chief of Dera Sacha Sauda, who is a convicted rapist. This situation has sparked debate about the application of justice and the use of stringent laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) . Key Developments Bail Denial: The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam on January 5, 2026 . Parole Granted: Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh , serving a 20-year jail term , was granted a 40-day parole , his 15th since his conviction in 2017 . Opposition Response: Opposition leaders questioned the disparity in treatment, highlighting concerns about the application of justice. UAPA Concerns: The CPI(M) criticized the use of UAPA to suppress dissent, arguing that it violates principles of natural justice. Supreme Court Rationale: The Supreme Court granted bail to five other accused, citing "hierarchy of participation." Those granted bail include activists Gulfisha Fatima , Meeran Haider , Shifa Ur Rehman , Mohd. Saleem Khan and Shadab Ahmad . Statements from Leaders John Brittas (CPI(M) MP): Brittas stated that the principle of 'bail is the rule, jail the exception' does not seem to apply equally to all individuals. He highlighted that Umar Khalid has been detained for over 5 years under UAPA without the trial even beginning, while Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh enjoys repeated parole despite his conviction. CPI(M): The party asserted that the denial of bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam , who have spent over five years in jail under UAPA without trial, violates the principles of natural justice. They emphasized that prolonged pre-trial incarceration undermines the constitutional right to liberty and a speedy trial. Manoj Jha (RJD MP): Jha raised
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Opposition questions denial of bail to Umar, Sharjeel; flags Gurmeet Ram Rahim's 15th parole
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Read Original

Analysis

Prelims Facts (Factual Knowledge)

  1. Date of Supreme Court's bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam: January 5, 2026.
  2. Number of deaths in the February 2020 Delhi riots: 53.
  3. Act under which Umar Khalid has been detained: UAPA.
  4. Number of times Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh has been granted parole since 2017: 15.
  5. Names of activists granted bail by the Supreme Court: Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman, Mohd. Saleem Khan, Shadab Ahmad.

Mains Angles (Analytical Discussion)

  1. Analyze the implications of prolonged pre-trial detention under UAPA on fundamental rights.
  2. Discuss the controversies surrounding the grant of parole to convicts serving long sentences, with reference to Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh's case.
  3. Evaluate the role of the judiciary in balancing national security concerns with individual liberties in cases involving UAPA.
  4. Critically examine the use of UAPA in targeting dissenting voices and its impact on freedom of expression.
  5. Assess the principles of natural justice in the context of bail decisions and pre-trial incarceration.

Essay Themes (Critical Thinking)

Balancing National Security and Individual Freedoms: The UAPA Debate

The Role of the Judiciary in Protecting Fundamental Rights

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: The Impact of Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention

Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT