Supreme Court delivered a series of landmark judgments on 3 June 2026 that touch upon environmental protection, digital public health, and the constitutional process of judicial appointments. The rulings range from forming a specialised committee to revisit the definition of the Aravalli range, to upholding state bans on online games that involve betting, and to clarifying the criteria for appointing judges and for safeguarding menstrual hygiene.
Key Developments
- Constitution of a High-Powered Expert Committee to reassess the definition of the Aravalli Hills.
- Supreme Court upholds Tamil Nadu and Karnataka laws that ban online games with monetary stakes, stating that there is no constitutional protection for Betting on Games of Skill.
- Cancellation of pre‑arrest bail for policemen accused of extortion, emphasizing that law‑enforcers cannot misuse their powers.
- Quashing of an FIR on the basis that a second complaint with material improvements does not automatically revive the case.
- Collegium recommendations for the appointment of several advocates as judges in the Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts.
- Recognition by the Court that excessive online gaming can turn a mobile phone into a ‘virtual gambling house’, posing a public‑health threat.
- Guidance that prolonged marital separation may amount to ‘mental cruelty’, and that a relationship need not be sustained if it is dead.
- Clarification that a person with higher qualifications cannot be excluded from a post meant for less‑educated candidates.
- Direction to Union and State governments to make the Menstrual Hygiene Right meaningful and workable.
Important Facts
The Court’s decision on the Aravalli definition will influence land‑use policies, mining clearances and forest‑conservation programmes across several states. The judgment on online gaming aligns with earlier concerns about gambling addiction and will affect the regulatory framework for digital platforms. The Collegium’s recommendations reflect t