Skip to main content
Loading page, please wait…
HomeCurrent AffairsEditorialsGovt SchemesLearning ResourcesUPSC SyllabusPricingAboutUPSC AI ToolsUPSC AI ToolAI for UPSCUPSC ChatGPT

© 2026 Vaidra. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
Vaidra Logo
Vaidra

Top 7 items + smart groups

UPSC GPT
New
Mains Evaluator
Test Generator
Geography Lab
New
Current Affairs
Daily Solutions
Daily Puzzle

Version 2.0.0 • Built with ❤️ for UPSC aspirants

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Telangana Irrigation Minister accuses BRS of neglecting Palamuru-Rangareddy Irrigation Project

Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy criticized the previous BRS government for neglecting the Palamuru-Ranga Reddy project and diverting funds to Kaleshwaram. He highlighted the delays and alleged financial mismanagement, promising to complete the project and deliver water to Palamuru.
Overview Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy has accused the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) regime of neglecting the Palamuru-Ranga Reddy project and diverting funds to the Kaleshwaram project . He claimed that the BRS leadership was misleading the public on irrigation projects in Palamuru, Nalgonda, and Khammam districts . Key Allegations and Claims Neglect of Palamuru-Ranga Reddy Project Mr. Reddy stated that the BRS leaders were spreading false propaganda about injustice to Palamuru, Nalgonda, and Khammam . He emphasized that the Palamuru–Ranga Reddy project was originally proposed for 90 TMC — 45 TMC through minor irrigation and 45 TMC via Godavari diversion. BRS's Stance in Supreme Court The Irrigation Minister alleged that BRS agreed to only 7 TMC in the Supreme Court and failed to complete the project in ten years. He assured that the current government would complete the project and deliver water to Palamuru. Delay and Financial Mismanagement Mr. Reddy criticized the delay in sending the Detailed Project Report (DPR) to the Centre, which took seven years. He pointed out that by then, ₹21,000 crore had already been spent. Out of an estimated ₹65,000 crore , only ₹27,000 crore was spent in a decade. He also mentioned that land acquisition for canals would require ₹70,000 crore in total. Expenditure Discrepancies Comparison of Project Spending Mr. Reddy highlighted that only ₹27,000 crore was spent on Palamuru, while ₹1 lakh crore was spent on Kaleshwaram, questioning the discrimination against Palamuru. He also mentioned that the Congress Government in just two years spent ₹7,000 crore on irrigation and installed 11 motors , compared to only one pump under BRS. Incomplete Projects He charged that the then BRS regime deliberately slowed down works and lamented that pending projects like Nettampadu, Kalwakurthi, and Bhima remain incomplete. He pointed out neglect of SLBC , which could have been completed with ₹2,000 crore , and failure to finish Kalwakurthi despite requiring only ₹900 crore . UPSC Relevance This news article is relevant to GS2 (Government Policies and Politics) and GS3 (Infrastructure and Economy) . It highlights issues related to irrigation projects, fund allocation, and regional development, which are important for the UPSC Civil Services Exam. Key Takeaways for UPSC Aspirants Understanding the importance of irrigation projects for agricultural development. Analyzing the challenges in implementing large-scale infrastructure projects. Evaluating the role of government policies in ensuring equitable regional development.
Loading article...
Explore:Current Affairs·Editorial Analysis·Govt Schemes·Study Materials·Previous Year Questions·UPSC GPT
  1. Home
  2. Prepare
  3. Current Affairs
  4. Politics
  5. Burning Issues
  6. Telangana Irrigation Minister accuses BRS of neglecting Palamuru-Rangareddy Irrigation Project
GS265% Exam RelevanceBurning Issues
Prelims
62%
Mains
35%
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete

Overview

Full Article

Overview

Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy has accused the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) regime of neglecting the Palamuru-Ranga Reddy project and diverting funds to the Kaleshwaram project. He claimed that the BRS leadership was misleading the public on irrigation projects in Palamuru, Nalgonda, and Khammam districts.

Key Allegations and Claims

Neglect of Palamuru-Ranga Reddy Project

Mr. Reddy stated that the BRS leaders were spreading false propaganda about injustice to Palamuru, Nalgonda, and Khammam. He emphasized that the Palamuru–Ranga Reddy project was originally proposed for 90 TMC — 45 TMC through minor irrigation and 45 TMC via Godavari diversion.

BRS's Stance in Supreme Court

The Irrigation Minister alleged that BRS agreed to only 7 TMC in the Supreme Court and failed to complete the project in ten years. He assured that the current government would complete the project and deliver water to Palamuru.

Delay and Financial Mismanagement

Mr. Reddy criticized the delay in sending the Detailed Project Report (DPR) to the Centre, which took seven years. He pointed out that by then, ₹21,000 crore had already been spent. Out of an estimated ₹65,000 crore, only ₹27,000 crore was spent in a decade. He also mentioned that land acquisition for canals would require ₹70,000 crore in total.

Expenditure Discrepancies

Comparison of Project Spending

Mr. Reddy highlighted that only ₹27,000 crore was spent on Palamuru, while ₹1 lakh crore was spent on Kaleshwaram, questioning the discrimination against Palamuru. He also mentioned that the Congress Government in just two years spent ₹7,000 crore on irrigation and installed 11 motors, compared to only one pump under BRS.

Incomplete Projects

He charged that the then BRS regime deliberately slowed down works and lamented that pending projects like Nettampadu, Kalwakurthi, and Bhima remain incomplete. He pointed out neglect of SLBC, which could have been completed with ₹2,000 crore, and failure to finish Kalwakurthi despite requiring only ₹900 crore.

Exam Relevance

This news article is relevant to GS2 (Government Policies and Politics) and GS3 (Infrastructure and Economy). It highlights issues related to irrigation projects, fund allocation, and regional development, which are important for the UPSC Civil Services Exam.

Key Takeaways for UPSC Aspirants

  • Understanding the importance of irrigation projects for agricultural development.
  • Analyzing the challenges in implementing large-scale infrastructure projects.
  • Evaluating the role of government policies in ensuring equitable regional development.
Read Original

Analysis

Prelims Facts (Factual Knowledge)

  1. Name of the Irrigation Minister: N. Uttam Kumar Reddy
  2. Name of the project mentioned: Palamuru-Ranga Reddy project
  3. River diversion mentioned: Godavari diversion
  4. Amount spent on Kaleshwaram project: ₹1 lakh crore
  5. Original proposed capacity of Palamuru–Ranga Reddy project: 90 TMC

Mains Angles (Analytical Discussion)

  1. Analyze the reasons for delays in irrigation projects in India, using the Palamuru-Ranga Reddy project as a case study.
  2. Discuss the impact of political interference on the implementation of irrigation projects.
  3. Evaluate the importance of efficient water management and irrigation for agricultural development in drought-prone regions.

Essay Themes (Critical Thinking)

Water Management and Sustainable Development

The Role of Infrastructure in Regional Development

Related PYQs

No related PYQs linked to this article yet.

Related:Daily•Weekly

Loading related articles...

Loading related articles...

Tip: Click articles above to read more from the same date, or use the back button to see all articles.

Telangana Irrigation Minister accuses BRS ... | UPSC Current Affairs

Related Topics

  • 📚Subject TopicWhat are the Key Facts of the Case and the Supreme Court’s Ruling?
  • 📚Subject TopicWhat are the Supreme Court’s Rulings and Legal Notifications on the Aravallis?
  • 📚Subject TopicSupreme Court Ruling on the SC and ST Act 1989
  • 📰Current AffairsSupreme Court Senior Advocate Venkatesh Defends Menstrual Temple Restrictions in Sabarimala Case
  • 📰Current AffairsSupreme Court Orders Appellate Tribunals of Former HC Judges for West Bengal SIR Appeals