U.S. Section 301 Probe on Forced Labour Targets India, China and 60 Economies The USTR announced on 12 March 2026 a new Section 301 investigation covering 60 economies. This is the second such probe this month, focusing on whether goods produced with forced labour enter global supply chains and affect U.S. commerce. Key Developments Probe examines two scenarios: direct use of forced‑labour in production, and use of imported inputs made with forced labour that are later incorporated into goods exported to the U.S. China is expected to be central, given allegations of forced‑labour in the Xinjiang region, especially in cotton and polysilicon. India’s exports of solar panels, electronics and garments could face heightened scrutiny because many of these products rely on Chinese intermediate inputs. If the USTR finds policies “unreasonable or discriminatory,” it may impose tariffs or other trade restrictions on the implicated countries. Important Facts The investigation follows a prior GTRI report warning that Indian supply chains depend heavily on Chinese polysilicon and components. Xinjiang supplies roughly 20 % of the world’s cotton and a similar share of polysilicon, making these commodities high‑risk for forced‑labour allegations. India’s legal framework includes the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 , which prohibits forced labour domestically. However, the probe may still affect Indian exporters because of their reliance on imported Chinese inputs that could be deemed tainted. Relevance for UPSC Understanding this probe is vital for several GS papers: GS 3 (Economy) : Insight into how trade policy tools like Section 301 are used to protect domestic industries and enforce labour standards. GS 2 (Polity) : The role of the USTR illustrates executive‑level trade diplomacy. GS 4 (Ethics) : The ethical dimension of forced‑labour in global supply chains and the responsibility of importing nations. Way Forward India can mitigate risks by: Enhancing traceability mechanisms for raw materials, especially cotton and polysilicon, to certify they are free of forced‑labour. Diversifying import sources away from high‑risk regions, thereby reducing dependence on Chinese inputs linked to Xinjiang. Engaging diplomatically with the USTR to demonstrate compliance with international labour standards and the domestic Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 . Coordinating with industry bodies to develop a certification framework that aligns with U.S. import requirements. Proactive compliance will help safeguard Indian exports from potential tariffs and preserve market access to the United States.