US‑Israel Joint Strikes on Iran – Operations ‘Lion’s Roar’, ‘Epic Fury’ and Regional Fallout (Feb 28 2026) — UPSC Current Affairs | March 5, 2026
US‑Israel Joint Strikes on Iran – Operations ‘Lion’s Roar’, ‘Epic Fury’ and Regional Fallout (Feb 28 2026)
On 28 February 2026, the US and Israel launched joint air strikes—Operation ‘Lion’s Roar’ and ‘Epic Fury’—against Iran, prompting Iranian missile retaliation and a temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict threatens regional energy security, disrupts India’s Chabahar‑INSTC corridor, and highlights doctrines like Israel’s Begin policy and Iran’s Axis of Resistance, all of which are pivotal topics for UPSC preparation.
Overview The United States and Israel launched coordinated air strikes against Iran on 28 February 2026 , marking the third day of a rapidly escalating conflict. The attacks targeted Iran’s nuclear‑related facilities and major cities, prompting retaliatory missile launches on Israeli and US bases, disruption of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz , and heightened security concerns for India’s INSTC . The episode underscores the interplay of strategic doctrines, regional alliances, and global energy security. Key Developments Operation ‘Lion’s Roar’ : Israel’s daylight strike on Tehran and several Iranian cities, including Isfahan , was announced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a joint US‑Israel operation. Operation “Epic Fury” : US President Donald Trump confirmed US involvement, labeling the strikes as “major combat operations in Iran” and reiterating the US stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Operation ‘True Promise 4’ : Iran retaliated with missile attacks on Tel Aviv and US assets, also targeting US‑aligned Gulf states – UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. Strait of Hormuz Closure : The IRGC warned vessels that the strait was closed, threatening a choke‑point for global oil and LNG shipments. Begin Doctrine : Israel’s policy that pre‑emptive strikes are justified if an adversary is perceived to possess weapons of mass destruction. Impact on India : The conflict jeopardises the Chabahar Port and the broader INSTC, both critical to India’s trade diversification. Axis of Resistance : Iran‑backed groups – Hezbollah, Hamas, PIJ and the Houthis – have pledged support, widening the geopolitical stakes. Important Facts The strikes caused significant damage to Iran’s ballistic‑missile infrastructure in Isfahan and naval facilities in Kenarak. Iranian missiles hit residential areas in Tel Aviv, raising civilian casualty concerns. Global shipping routes faced disruptions, with oil prices reacting to the perceived threat to the Strait of Hormuz. UPSC Relevance 1. Begin Doctrine illustrates how doctrinal narratives shape foreign‑policy decisions. 2. The Axis of Resistance highlights non‑state actors’ role in modern warfare. 3. Disruption of the Strait of Hormuz underscores the strategic importance of energy corridors. 4. The impact on Chabahar Port and the INSTC is directly linked to India’s “Neighbourhood First” and “Act East” policies, a frequent UPSC essay topic. Way Forward For policymakers, maintaining open communication channels with Iran while reinforcing deterrence is essential to prevent further escalation. India should accelerate alternative trade routes, such as the INSTC , and diversify energy imports to mitigate Strait‑of‑Hormuz risks. Strengthening diplomatic engagement with Gulf states and the broader international community can help manage the fallout from the US‑Israel‑Iran confrontation.
Must Review
Login to bookmark articles
Login to mark articles as complete
Overview
US‑Israel strikes on Iran raise India’s energy security and regional diplomatic challenges
Key Facts
28 Feb 2026 – US and Israel launched coordinated air strikes (Operations ‘Lion’s Roar’ and ‘Epic Fury’) on Iran’s nuclear and missile facilities.
Iran’s retaliation (Operation ‘True Promise 4’) involved ballistic missile launches on Tel Aviv, US bases in the Gulf and the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar.
IRGC announced closure of the Strait of Hormuz, threatening 20‑25 % of global oil shipments and causing a sharp rise in crude prices.
Key Iranian ballistic‑missile production sites in Isfahan and the naval base at Kenarak were significantly damaged.
India’s strategic projects – Chabahar Port and the International North‑South Transport Corridor (INSTC) – faced disruption, affecting trade diversification.
Israel’s ‘Begin Doctrine’ justifies pre‑emptive strikes against perceived WMD threats, guiding its foreign‑policy decisions.
The Iran‑backed ‘Axis of Resistance’ (Hezbollah, Hamas, PIJ, Houthis) pledged support, widening the regional security stakes.
Background & Context
The joint US‑Israel operation reflects the interplay of strategic doctrines (Begin Doctrine) and the US’s containment policy toward Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The ensuing closure of the Strait of Hormuz and threats to the Chabahar‑INSTC link directly to GS‑3 energy security and GS‑2 India‑neighbourhood relations, underscoring the geopolitical ripple effects for India’s trade and energy imports.
UPSC Syllabus Connections
GS2•India and its neighborhood relationsEssay•International Relations and GeopoliticsGS1•World Wars and redrawal of national boundariesGS3•Role of external state and non-state actors in security challengesPrelims_GS•International Current AffairsGS2•Effect of policies of developed and developing countries on IndiaGS2•Bilateral, regional and global groupings involving IndiaGS2•Constitutional posts, bodies and their powers and functionsPrelims_GS•Physics and Chemistry in Everyday LifePrelims_GS•Constitution and Political System
Mains Answer Angle
GS‑2: Analyse the implications of the US‑Israel strikes on Iran for India’s energy security and its diplomatic posture in the Middle East, and suggest policy measures to mitigate strategic vulnerabilities.